Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:17:01.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling B clustering in Si and SiGe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Ljubo Radic
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-6130, USA
Aaron D. Lilak
Affiliation:
Technology CAD Department, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, OR 97124, USA
Mark E. Law
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-6130, USA
Get access

Abstract

Our experiments show boron-interstitial cluster dissolution is reduced during oxidation, a behavior not predicted by the current models. Both our experiments and others on the time dependence indicate the reactivation is coming from more than one cluster. Since oxidation induced interstitial injection reduces reactivation, one of the significant clusters has to release an interstitial release during dissolution. Recent ab-initio calculations provide a qualitatively different B clustering model, with two significant cluster species. Based on these energetics, we have developed a new physically based model that for the first time accounts for the experimentally observed cluster dissolution time and ambient dependence.

Anomalous B diffusion behavior is also observed in an investigation of Ge influence on B diffusion. Silicon wafers were subjected to a Si preamorphization implant (PAI), followed by Ge and B implants contained within the existing amorphous layer. The control sample received only Si PAI and B implant. Upon annealing, the peak of the B profile shifts towards the surface and increases in magnitude, exhibiting uphill diffusion. The control samples subjected to the same thermal processing exhibit TED, but no uphill diffusion behavior. This is consistent with the model of B diffusion in Si1−xGex, accounting for trapping of B at Ge sites through formation of GeB complex.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Eaglesham, D. J., Stolk, P. A., Gossmann, H.-J., and Poate, J. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 2305 (1994)Google Scholar
2 Jones, K.S., Liu, J., and Zhang, L., Proceedings of Spring Electrochemical Soc. Meeting, 96–4, 116 (1996)Google Scholar
3 Stolk, P. A., Gossmann, H. J., Eaglesham, D. J., Jacobson, D. C., and Poate, J. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 568 (1995)Google Scholar
4 Lever, R. F., Bonar, J. M., Willoughby, A. F. W., J. Appl. Phys. 83, 1988 (1998)Google Scholar
5 Zangenberg, N. R., Fage-Pedersen, J., Hansen, J. Lundsgaard, and Larsen, A. Nylandsted, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 3883 (2003)Google Scholar
6 Pelaz, L., Venezia, V. C., Gossmann, H.-J., Gilmer, G. H., Fiory, A. T., Rafferty, C. S., Jaraiz, M., and Barbolla, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 662 (1999)Google Scholar
7 Hu, S. M., J. Appl. Phys. 45, 1567 (1974)Google Scholar
8 Radic, Lj., Lilak, A. D., and Law, M. E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 826 (2002)Google Scholar
9 Solmi, S., Bersani, M., Sbetti, M., Hansen, J. Lundsgaard, Larsen, A. Nylandsted, J. Appl. Phys 88, 4547 (2000)Google Scholar
10 Jones, K. S., Elliman, R. G., Petravi, M. M., and Kringhøj, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 3111 (1996)Google Scholar
11 Liu, X.-Y., Windl, W., and Masquelier, M. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 2018 (2000).Google Scholar
12 FLorida Object Oriented Process Simulator, University of Florida, Florida 2002.Google Scholar
13 UT-Marlowe version 5.0, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 2000.Google Scholar