Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:41:47.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular Hydrogen in Amorphous Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

D. J. Leopold ,
P. A. Fedders  and
R. E. Norberg
D. J. Leopold
Affiliation:
Washington University, Department of Physics, St. Louis, MO 63130 Center for Molecular Electronics, University of Missouri-St. Louis, MO 63121
P. A. Fedders
Affiliation:
Washington University, Department of Physics, St. Louis, MO 63130
R. E. Norberg
Affiliation:
Washington University, Department of Physics, St. Louis, MO 63130
Get access

Abstract

Proton NMR studies on hydrogen in numerous plasma deposited a-Si:H thin film samples over many years have established that there are primarily two dipolar broadened lines, representing different distinct degrees of proton clustering involving most of the contained hydrogen. In addition, both of these configurations were thought to be hydrogen tightly bonded to silicon. However, deuteron magnetic resonance established long ago that a substantial fraction of the hydrogen (deuterium) population was a weakly bonded species, very different than the silicon bonded hydrogen typically seen in infrared measurements. Deuteron magnetic resonance can easily distinguish bond strength because deuterons have spin, an electric quadrupole moment, and are sensitive to electric field gradients. The much weaker deuteron dipolar coupling results in NMR line shapes and widths that are determined by distributions of electric field gradients and angular averages about the applied magnetic field direction. The primary features of the deuteron line shape are a sharp powder-pattern Pake doublet attributed to the tightly silicon bonded species and a broad central Gaussian component originally interpreted as a weakly bound component, but now recognized as molecular deuterium and HD trapped in the amorphous equivalent of T-sites. This latter result is confirmed by spin-echo double resonance experiments using 1H and 29Si nuclides, which reveal a very appreciable population of molecular hydrogen in T-like sites. NMR line shape subtractions also indicate that the majority of this species resides in the less-clustered hydrogen phase. Also a comparison of the T-site molecular hydrogen fraction with measured photoresponse, combined with light-induced changes in the DMR line shape, indicate that this species is in regions of a-Si:H that control the optoelectronic properties of the material.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 715: Symposium A – Amorphous and Heterogeneous Silicon-Based Films-2002 , 2002 , A1.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Reimer, J. A., Vaughan, R. W., and Knights, J. C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 193 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Carlos, W. E. and Taylor, P. C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 358 (1980).Google Scholar
3. Conradi, M. S. and Norberg, R. E., Phys. Rev. B 24, 2285 (1981).Google Scholar
4. Carlos, W. E. and Taylor, P. C., Phys. Rev. B 25, 1435 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Leopold, D. J., Boyce, J. B., Fedders, P. A., and Norberg, R. E., Phys. Rev. B 26, 6053 (1982).Google Scholar
6. Leopold, D. J., Fedders, P. A., Norberg, R. E., Boyce, J. B., and Knights, J. C., Phys. Rev. B 31, 5642 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Norberg, R. E., Fedders, P. A., and Leopold, D. J., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 420, 475 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Cull, T. S., Kernan, M. J., Chan, P. H., Fedders, P. A., Leopold, D. J., Norberg, R. E., Wickboldt, P., and Paul, W., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 467, 123 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Norberg, R. E., Leopold, D. J., and Fedders, P. A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 227, 124 (1998).Google Scholar
10. Borzi, R., Mascarenhas, F., Fedders, P. A., Leopold, D. J., Norberg, R. E., Wickboldt, P., and Paul, W., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 557, 287 (1999).Google Scholar
11. Boyce, J. B. and Stutzmann, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 562 (1985).Google Scholar
12. Fedders, P. A., Phys. Rev. B 34, 7489 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Fedders, P. A., Leopold, D. J., Chan, P. H., Borzi, R., and Norberg, R. E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 401 (2000).Google Scholar
14. Fedders, P. A., Phys. Rev. B 63, 165201 (2001).Google Scholar
15. Staebler, D. L. and Wronski, C. R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 292 (1977).Google Scholar
16. Mackenzie, K. D., Eggert, J. R., Leopold, D. J., Li, Y. M., Lin, S., and Paul, W., Phys. Rev. B 31, 2198 (1985).Google Scholar
17. Slichter, C. P., Principles of Magnetic Resonance (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990).Google Scholar
18. Norberg, R. E., Bodart, J., Corey, R., Fedders, P. A., Paul, W., Turner, W. A., Pang, D., and Wetsel, A., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 258, 377 (1992).Google Scholar