Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T05:42:52.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular Level Study of Insensitive and Energetic Layered and Intercalated Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Richard D. Bardo*
Affiliation:
Naval Surface Warfare Center, White Oak, Silver Spring, MD 20903
Get access

Abstract

An important goal in the detonation physics and chemistry community is to design explosives with high-performance capabilities, yet sufficiently low impact and shock sensitivities. The traditional ways of developing increasingly energetic explosives have led to an increase in sensitivity. It is, therefore, of practical and theoretical importance to design, from molecular level considerations, polycrystalline explosive systems which clearly exhibit directional sensitivity and initiation properties, and which approach the insensitivity of homogeneous or single-crystal explosives. Theoretical studies indicate that such systems may be constructed from special materials such as high-quality pyrolytic, layered, hexagonal boron nitride (BN) crystals. Intercalation of the crystals with various oxidizing agents can yield an explosive system with the desired properties. Under ordinary laboratory conditions and with modest pressures, the intercalate molecules readily enter the host lattice by exploiting the weak bonding between the layers, resulting in denser, metastable crystals. High energy release is achieved when products containing B2O3 are formed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Campbell, A. W., Davis, W. C., and Travis, J. R., Phys. Fluids 4, 498 (1961).Google Scholar
2. Campbell, A. W. and Travis, J. R., in Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium (Int.) on Detonation, NSWC MP 86–194, 15–19 Aug 1985, p.1057.Google Scholar
3. Dick, J. J., Mulford, R. N., Spencer, W. J., Pettit, D. R., Garcia, E., and Shaw, D. W., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 3572 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Cady, H. B. and Larson, A. C., Acta Cryst. 18, 485 (1965).Google Scholar
5. van der Steen, A. C., Verbeek, H. J., and Meulenbrugge, J. J., in Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium (Int.) on Detonation, Vol.1, OCNR 113291–7, 28 Aug-1 Sep 1989, p. 83.Google Scholar
6. Bartlett, N. and McQuillan, B. W., in Intercalation Chemistry, edited by Whittingham, M. S. and Jacobson, A. J. (Academic Press, New York, 1982), pp. 1953.Google Scholar
7. Thomas, J. M., Millward, G. R., Schlogl, R. F., and Boehm, H. P, Mat. Res. Bull. 15, 67 (1980).Google Scholar
8. Amelinckx, S., Delavignette, P., and Heerschap, M., in Chemisyn and Physics of Carbon, Vol.1, edited by Walker, P. L. (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York,1965), pp. 171.Google Scholar
9. Bardo, R. D., Int. J. Quantum Chem. S20, 455 (1986); R. D. Bardo, in Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium (Int.) on Detonation, Vol.1, OCNR 113291–7, 28 Aug- 1 Sep 1989, p. 235.Google Scholar
10. Colebum, N. L. and Forbes, J. W., J. Chem. Phys. 48, 555 (1968).Google Scholar
11. Green, J. F., Bolsaitis, P., and Spain, I. L., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 34, 1927 (1973).Google Scholar
12. Rice, M. H., McQueen, R. G., and Walsh, J. M., in Solid State Physics. edited by Seitz, F. and Turnbull, D. (Academic Press Inc., New York, 1958), pp. 163.Google Scholar