Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T10:19:43.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Morphology of Grain Boundary Interactions with Twins in YBa2Cu3O7−δ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Jenn-Yue Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2275, U. S. A.
A. H. King
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2275, U. S. A.
Get access

Abstract

Various morphologies are observed where twins meet grain boundaries in YBa2Cu3O7−δ. Twins may be “correlated” at the boundary (i.e. twin boundaries from one grain may meet a twin boundary from the other grain in a quadruple junction) and the twins may be narrowed or “constricted” at the boundary. These effects are determined by the interfacial energy. We estimate the energy of the various interfaces by determining the dislocation arrays they contain, using the constrained coincidence site lattice (CCSL) model and Bollmann's O2-lattice formalism. Our approach indicates that there are significant changes in the energy of the interfaces and is thus able to explain the variety of observed morphologies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. , Dimos, , Chaudhari, , Mannhart and , Legoues, Phys. Rev. Lett., 61, 219 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Gayle, F.W. and Kaiser, D.L., J. Mater. Res. 6, 908 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Smith, D. A., Chisholm, M. F., and Clabes, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 5 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Wang, J.-Y., Zhu, Y., King, A. H. and Suenaga, M., Proc. 51st. Ann. Mtg. MSA, Eds. Bailey, G.W. and Rieder, C. L. (San Francisco Press, San Francisco, 1993).Google Scholar
5. Babcock, S.E. and Larbelestier, D. C., J. Mater. Res., 5, 919 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Singh, A., Chandrasekhar, N. and King, A. H., Acta Cryst. B46, 117 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Bruggeman, G. A., Bishop, G. H. and Hart, W. H., The Nature and Behavior of Grain Boundaries, ed. Hu, Hsun, 83, 1972.Google Scholar
8. Chen, F.-R. and King, A. H., Phil. Mag. A, 57, 431 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Shin, K. and King, A. H., Mater. Sci. Eng. A113, 121 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Bollmann, W., Phil. Mag., 16, 363 (1967).Google Scholar
11. Bollmann, W., Phil. Mag., 16, 383 (1967).Google Scholar
12. Tendeloo, C. Van and Amelinckx, S., J. Elect. Micro. Tech., 8, 285 (1988).Google Scholar