Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T10:26:54.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multiscale Modeling of Reinforced Epoxy Resins by Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2011

Kelvin Suggs
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Center for Functional Nanoscale Materials, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, Georgia 30314, U.S.A. Department of Physics, Center for Functional Nanoscale Materials, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, Georgia 30314, U.S.A.
Vernecia Person
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Center for Functional Nanoscale Materials, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, Georgia 30314, U.S.A.
Chantel Nicolas
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Center for Functional Nanoscale Materials, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, Georgia 30314, U.S.A.
Xiao-Qian Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Center for Functional Nanoscale Materials, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, Georgia 30314, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Nanocomposites are of increasing interest due to their unique structural, electronic, and thermal properties. Simultaneously, multiscale molecular modeling is becoming more robust. Therefore computational models are able to be examined with increased accuracy, complexity, and dimension. Graphene based molecules are lauded for their conductive properties as well as their architecture-like geometry which may allow bottom up nanoscale fabrication of nanoscopic structures. Furthermore, these macrocycled molecules allow high interactivity with other molecules including highly tensiled polymers that yield other novel supramolecular structures when interacted. These supramolecular structures are being investigated in lieu of a variety of potential applications. Nanocomposites of cured epoxy resin reinforced by single-walled carbon nanotubes exhibit a plethora of interesting behavior at the molecular level. A fundamental issue is how the self-organized dynamic structure of functional molecular systems affects the interactions of the nano-reinforced composites. A combination of force-field based molecular dynamics and local density-functional calculations shows that the stacking between the aromatic macrocycle and the surface of the SWNTs manifests itself via increased interfacial binding. First-principles calculations on the electronic structures further reveal that there exists distinct level hybridization behavior for metallic and semiconducting nanotubes. In addition there is a monatomic increase in binding energy with an increase in the nanotube diameter. The simulation studies suggest that graphene nanoplatelets are potentially the best fillers of epoxy matrices. The implications of these results for understanding dispersion mechanism and future nanocomposite developments are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bekyarova, E., Thostenson, E. T., Yu, A., Itkis, M. E., Fakhrutdinov, D., Chou, T. W. and Haddon, R. C., Functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes for carbon fiber-epoxy composites, Langmuir, 2007, 23, 3970.Google Scholar
2. Frankland, S. J. V., Caglar, A., Brener, D. W. and Griebel, M., Molecular simulation of the influence of chemical crosslinks on the shear strength of carbon nanotube–polymer interfaces, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 3046.Google Scholar
3. Gao, J., Hou, G., Wang, Y., Li, H. and Liu, Y., Curing and thermal properties of PEPEB liquid crystalline diepoxide/aromatic diamine, Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng., 2006, 45, 94.Google Scholar
4. Wong, E. W., Sheehan, P. E. and Lieber, C. M., Nanobeam mechanics: elasticity, strength, and toughness of nanorods and nanotubes, Science, 1997, 277, 1971.Google Scholar
5. Ajayan, P. M., Schadler, L. S., Giannaris, S. C. and Rubio, A., Single-walled carbon nanotube-polymer composites: strength and weakness, Adv. Mater., 2000, 12, 750.Google Scholar
6. Steuerman, D. W., Star, A., Narizzano, R., Choi, H., Ries, R. S., Nicolini, C., Stoddart, J. F. and Heath, J. R., Interactions between conjugated polymers and single-walled carbon nanotubes, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 3124.Google Scholar
7. Kanungo, M., Lu, H., Malliaras, G. G. and Blanchet, G. B., Suppression of metallic conductivity of single-walled carbon nanotubes by cycloaddition reactions, Science, 2009, 323, 234.Google Scholar
8. Britz, D. A. and Khlobystov, A. N., Noncovalent interactions of molecules with single walled carbon nanotubes, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, 35, 637.Google Scholar
9. Zheng, M., Jagota, A., Semke, E. D., Diner, B. A., Mclean, R. S., Lustig, S. R., Richardson, R. E. and Tassi, N. G., DNA-assisted dispersion and separation of carbon nanotubes, Nat. Mater., 2003, 2, 338.Google Scholar
10. Chen, R. J., Zhang, Y., Wang, D. and Dai, H., Noncovalent sidewall functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes for protein immobilization, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 3838.Google Scholar
11. Nish, A., Hwang, J.-Y., Doig, J. and Nicholas, R. J., Highly selective dispersion of single-walled carbon nanotubes, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2007, 2, 640.Google Scholar
12. Ogunro, O. O. and Wang, X. Q., Quantum electronic stability in selective enrichment of carbon nanotubes, Nano Lett., 2009, 9, 1034.Google Scholar
13. Treacy, M. M. J., Ebbesen, T. W. and Gibson, J. M., Exceptionally high Young’s modulus observed for individual carbon nanotubes, Nature, 1996, 381, 678.Google Scholar
14. Gou, J., Fan, B., Song, G. and Khan, A., Study of affinities between single-walled nanotube and epoxy resin using molecular dynamics simulation, Int. J. Nanosci., 2006, 5, 131.Google Scholar
15. Fan, H. B. and Yuen, M. M. F., Material properties of the cross-linked epoxy resin compound predicted by molecular dynamics simulation, Polymer, 2007, 48, 2174.Google Scholar
16. Gou, J., Minaie, B., Wang, B., Liang, Z. and Zhang, C., Computational and experimental study of interfacial bonding of single-walled nanotube reinforced composites, Comp. Mater. Sci., 2004, 31, 225.Google Scholar
17. Johnson, R. R., Johnson, A. T. C. and Klein, M. L., Probing the structure of DNA-carbon nanotube hybrids with molecular dynamics, Nano Lett., 2008, 8, 69.Google Scholar
18. Jensen, F., Introduction to Computational Chemistry, 2nd ed, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2006.Google Scholar
19. Al-Haik, M., Hussaini, M. Y. and Garmestani, H., Adhesion energy in carbon nanotube-polyethylene composite: effect of chirality, J. Appl. Phys., 2005, 97, 074306.Google Scholar
20. DMol3, Accelrys Software Inc., San Diego, 2009.Google Scholar
21. Nduwimana, A. and Wang, X.-Q., Charge carrier separation in modulation doped coaxial semiconductor nanowires, Nano Lett., 2009, 9, 283.Google Scholar
22. Suggs, Kelvin, Wang, X.-Q., Structural and Electronic Properties of Carbon Nanotube-Reinforced Epoxy Resins", Nanoscale, 2010, 2, 385.Google Scholar
23. Hohenberg, P. and Kohn, W., “Inhomogeneous Electron Gas", Physical Review, 136, B864871(1964); M. C. Payne, M. P. Teter, D. C. Allan, T. A. Arias, and T. D. Joannopoulos, "Iterative minimization techniques for ab initio total energy calculations: molecular dynamics and conjugate gradients", Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 1045(1992) Google Scholar
24. Kohn, W. and Sham, L. J., “Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects", Physical Review, 140, A11331138 (1965); W. Kohn, "Density-functional and density-matrix method scaling linearly with the number of atoms", Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3168(1996). Google Scholar
25. Phillips, James C., Braun, Rosemary, Wang, Wei, Gumbart, James, Tajkhorshid, Emad, Villa, Elizabeth, Chipot, Christophe, Skeel, Robert D., Kale, Laxmikant, and Schulten, Klaus, “Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD", Journal of Computational Chemistry, 26:17811802, (2005).Google Scholar