Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T15:23:59.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Native Defects and Impurities in Cubic and Wurtzite Gan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Jö;Rg Neugebauer
Affiliation:
Xerox PARC, 3333 Coyote Hill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304
Chris G. Van De Walle
Affiliation:
Xerox PARC, 3333 Coyote Hill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304
Get access

Abstract

Using state-of-the-art total energy calculations we investigate defect formation energies and electronic structure for native defects in wurtzite and cubic GaN.The defect formation energies and electronic structures are very similar in both structures. The main difference is a split in the p-like defect states in wurtzite GaN, which are degenerate in cubic GaN.|The role of the Ga 3d electrons on the chemical bonding in GaN is discussed in detail. We explain why the deep lying Ga 3d electrons have a remarkably strong influence on defect formation energies and atomic relaxation for some of the defects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Amano, H., Kito, M., Hiramutsu, K., Akasaki, I., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 2112 (1989).Google Scholar
2. Madar, R., Jacob, G., Hallais, J., and Fruchart, R., J. Cryst. Growth 31, 197 (1975).Google Scholar
3. Pankove, J. I., MRS Symp. Proc. 162, 515 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Lei, T., Fanciulli, M., Molnar, R. J., Moustakas, T. D., Graham, R. J., and Scanlon, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 944 (1991)Google Scholar
5. Troullier, N. and Martins, J. L., Phys. Rev. B 43, 1993 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Neugebauer, J. and Van de Walle, C. G., to be published.Google Scholar
7. Stumpf, R. and Scheffler, M., Computer Phys. Commun, to be published.Google Scholar
8. Fiorentini, V., Methfessel, M., and Scheffler, M., Phys. Rev. B 48, 13353 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Louie, S. G., Froyen, S. and Cohen, M.L., Phys. Rev. B 26, 1739 (1982).Google Scholar
10. Monkhorst, H. J. and Pack, J. D., Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976).Google Scholar
11. Jenkins, D. W. and Dow, J. D., Phys. Rev. B 39, 3317 (1989).Google Scholar