Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T18:18:16.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neptunium(V) Sorption Behavior on Clinoptilolite, Quartz and Montmorillonite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

F. P. Bertetti
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238–5166.
R. T. Pabalan
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238–5166.
D. R. Turner
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238–5166.
M. G. Almendarez
Affiliation:
Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238–5166.
Get access

Abstract

Performance assessment models have identified 237Np as a radionuclide of concern in meeting release limits established for the geologic disposal of high-level nuclear waste at the proposed repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. In this study, quartz, clinoptilolite, and montmorillonite, which are minerals representative of phases that occur both in the rock matrix and as fracture coatings at Yucca Mountain, were reacted with 237Np-bearing solutions to characterize the sorption behavior of Np(V) on these minerals.

Batch experiments were conducted over a wide range of conditions in which pH of solution, surface loading, sorbent surface area, initial concentration of Np(V), and partial pressure of CO2 were varied. Initial Np(V) concentrations were between 1 × 10-7 and 1- 10-6 M in electrolyte solutions of 0.1 or 0.01 M NaNO3. The oxidation state of Np in solution was verified with NIR spectroscopy and by solvent extraction. Prior to the start of experiments, minerals were pretreated to eliminate impurities, and the clinoptilolite and montmorillonite were converted to Na-form by ion exchange with NaCI solutions.

Results indicate that, for all three minerals, Np(V) sorption begins at pH values coincident with the start of hydrolysis in solution (-7). For solutions undersaturated with respect to atmospheric CO2, sorption increases continuously with increasing pH. Under equilibrium with atmospheric CO2, Np(V) sorption is important in the pH range (7–9.5) where NpO2(OH)°(aq) is significant, whereas sorption is inhibited at higher pH where neptunyl carbonate complexes are the predominant species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wilson, M.L., Gauthier, J.H., Barnard, R.W., Barr, G.E., Dockery, H.A. et al., Total-System Performance Assessment for Yucca Mountain - SNL Second Iteration (TSPA-1993). Vol.1and 2. SAND93–2675, (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1994).Google Scholar
2. Allard, B., Olofsson, U., and Torstenfelt, B., Inorg. Chim. Acta 94, 205 (1984).Google Scholar
3. Bidoglio, G., Avogadro, A., DePlano, A. and Lazarri, G.P.. Radiochim. Acta 44/45, 29 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Lieser, K.H. and Miihlenweg, U., Radiochim. Acta 43, 27 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Nakayama, S. and Sakamato, Y., Radiochim. Acta 52/53, 179 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Nakayama, S., Arimoto, H., Yamada, N., Moriyama, H., and Higashi, K., Radiochim. Acta 52/53, 179 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Triay, I.R., Robinson, B.A., Lopez, R.M., Mitchell, A.J., and Overly, C.M., in Fourth Annual InternationalH igh-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference Proceedings,( American Nuclear Society and American Society of Civil Engineers, La Grange Park, IL, 1993) pp. 1,504–1,508.Google Scholar
8. Bish, D.L. and Chipera, S.J., Revised Mineralogic Summary of Yucca Mountain, Nevada, LA-11497-MS, (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 1989).Google Scholar
9. Pabalan, R.T., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 58, 4573 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Bertrand, P.A. and Choppin, G.R., Radiochim. Acta 31, 135 (1982).Google Scholar
11. Wolery, T., EQ3/6, A Software Package for Geochemical Modeling ofAqueous Systems, Vol.1–4, URCL-MA-110662, (Lawrenece Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 1992).Google Scholar
12. Rogers, P.S.Z. and Meijer, A., in Fourth Annual International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference Proceedings, (American Nuclear Society and American Society of Civil Engineers, La Grange Park, IL, 1993) pp. 1,509–1,516.Google Scholar
13. Righetto, L., Bidoglio, G., Azimonti, G., and Bellobono, I.R., Env. Sci. Tech. 25 (11), 1913 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Kozai, N., in Progress Report on Safety Research on Radioactive Waste Management for the Period/ April 1992 to March 1993, edited by Muraoka, S., Senoo, M., and Sekine, K. (Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Tokai, 1994), pp. 3941.Google Scholar
15. Itagaki, H., Nakayama, S., Tanaka, S., and Yamawaki, M., Radiochim. Acta 58/59, 61 (1992).Google Scholar
16. Lemire, R.J., Boyer, G.D., and Cambell, A.B., Radiochim. Acta 61, 57 (1993)Google Scholar
17. Neck, V., Runde, W., and Kim, J.I., Alloys, J. and Compounds 225, 295 (1995).Google Scholar
18. Bidoglio, G., Tanet, G., and Chatt, A., Radiochim. Acta 38, 21 (1985).Google Scholar
19. Bidoglio, G., Offermann, P., and Saltelli, A., Appl. Geochem. 2, 275 (1987).Google Scholar
20. Allison, J.D., Brown, D.S., and Novo-Gradac, K.J., MINTEQA2/PRODEFA2, A Geochemical Assessment Model for Environmental Systems: Version 3. 0 User's Manual. EPA/600/3–91/021, (Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA, 1991).Google Scholar
21. Turner, D., Mechanistic Approaches to Radionuclide Sorption Modeling. CNWRA 95–001 (Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses, San Antonio, TX, 1993).Google Scholar
22. Lemire, R.J., An Assessment of the Thermodynamic Behavior of Neptunium in Water and Model Groundwaters from 25 to 150°C, AECL-7817, (Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, 1984).Google Scholar
23. Fuger, J., Radiochim. Acta 59, 89 (1992).Google Scholar
24. Danesi, P.R., Chiarizia, R., Scibona, G., and D'Alessandro, G., J. Inorg. Nuci. Chem. 33, 3,503 (1971).Google Scholar
25. Patil, S.K., Ramakrishna, V.V., Ramaniah, M.V., Coord. Chem. Rev. 25, 133 (1978).Google Scholar