Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T13:27:55.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on the Mechanics of Strained Epitaxial Island Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

L. B. Freund
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
H. T. Johnson
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
R. V. Kukta
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
Get access

Abstract

An epitaxial material island which has a lattice parameter differing by a small amount for that of its substrate is considered within the framework of continuum mechanics. The strain distribution in the island is determined for a range of aspect ratio, taking into account the compliance of the substrate. It is demonstrated that the total free energy of a strained island is minimum for some value of aspect ratio, and that this value depends on the volume of the island. To consider strain relaxation, the nucleation of a dislocation at the edge of a strained island is examined and the equilibrium aspect ratio of a dislocated island is computed. In particular, it is shown that an island can reduce its free energy by reducing its aspect ratio and, simultaneously, forming an interface misfit dislocation. The simulations are based on the numerical finite element method.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Yago, H., Nomura, T. and Ishikawa, K., Appl. Surf. Sci. 84, 119 (1995).Google Scholar
2 Leonard, D., Krishnamurthy, M., Reaves, C. M., Denbaars, S. P. and Petroff, P. M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 63, 3203 (1993).Google Scholar
3 Chen, Y., Lin, X. W., Liliental-Weber, Z., Washburn, J., Klem, J. F. and Tsao, J. Y., Appl. Phys. Lett., in press.Google Scholar
4 Trampert, A., Tournie, E. and Plogg, K. H., J. Crys. Growth 146, 368 (1995).Google Scholar
5 LeGoues, F. K., Reuter, M. C., Tersoff, J., Hammar, M. and Tromp, R. M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 300 (1994).Google Scholar
6 Abaqus (a general purpose finite element program), Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorenson Inc., Pawtucket, RI.Google Scholar
7 Gray, L. J., Chisholm, M. F. and Kaplan, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 1924 (1995).Google Scholar
8 Timoshenko, S. P. and Goodier, J. N., Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed. (McGraw- Hill Inc., New York, 1972), pp. 4150; pp. 141–144.Google Scholar
9 Eaglesham, D. J. and Cerullo, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1943 (1990).Google Scholar
10 Rice, J. R. and Thomson, R., Phil. Mag., 29, 78 (1974).Google Scholar
11 Hirth, J. P. and Lothe, J., Theory of Dislocations, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1982), pp. 9192.Google Scholar
12 Ling, C.-B., J. Math. and Phys. 26, 284 (1948).Google Scholar
13 Gosling, T. J. and Freund, L. B., Acta Metall. Matl., in press.Google Scholar
14 Freund, L. B. and Gosling, T. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2822 (1995).Google Scholar