Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-72kh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T07:18:52.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Roughening of Ceramic Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J. R. Heffelfinger
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Ave. S. E., Minneapolis, MN 55455
M. W. Bench
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Ave. S. E., Minneapolis, MN 55455
C. B. Carter
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Ave. S. E., Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access

Abstract

The faceting of single-crystal ceramic surfaces has been investigated by atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Single-crystals of α-Al2O3 (alumina) with different nominal surface orientations were annealed and used as a model system to investigate the faceting of a polished ceramic surfaces. The {1010} orientation of α-alumina, which facets into a hill-and-valley morphology, provides a dramatic representation of the different stages by which a surface facets. This surface starts faceting with the growth of an individual facet. The growth of this facet creates local surface disturbances that promote the nucleation of adjacent facets; thus, domains of faceted surface form on the otherwise smooth surface. Through time, these domains coalesce and the facets coarsen into a hill-and-valley morphology. Surfaces which facet into a terrace-and-step structure, such as (0001) and {1120} surfaces of alumina, are characterized for their progression of surface faceting and are compared with the stages of faceting observed for the {1010} surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Tietz, L. A., DeCooman, B. C., Carter, C. B., Lathrop, D. K., Russek, S. E. and Buhrman, R. A., Electr, J.. Micr. Tech. 8, 263272 (1988).Google Scholar
2 Susnitzky, D. W. and Carter, C. B., Comm. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69, C-217220 (1986).Google Scholar
3 Heffelfinger, J. R. and Carter, C. B., Sur. Sci. in press.Google Scholar
4 Herring, C., Phys. Rev. 82, 8793 (1951).Google Scholar
5 Tasker, P. W., in Surfaces of Magnesia and Alumina. (American Ceramics Society, Columbus, OH, (1984)) p. 176.Google Scholar
6 French, T. M. and Somorjai, G. A., J. Phys. Chem. 74, 24892495 (1970).Google Scholar
7 Gautier, M., Renaud, G., Van, L. P., Villette, B., Pollak, M., Thromat, N., Jollet, F. and Duraud, J.-P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 323334 (1994).Google Scholar
8 Moore, A. J. W., Acta Metall. Mater. 6, 293304 (1958).Google Scholar
9 Moore, A. J. W., in Metal Surfaces. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park OH, (1963)) p. 155.Google Scholar
10 Phaneuf, R. J. and Williams, E. D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 25632566 (1987).Google Scholar
11 Hibino, H., Homma, Y. and Ogino, T., Phys. Rev. B 51, 77537761 (1995).Google Scholar
12 Wang, Z. L. and Shapiro, A.J., Sur. Sci. 328, 141158 (1995).Google Scholar
13 Berkstresser, G. W., Valentino, A. J. and Brandle, C. D., J. Cryst. Growth 109, 467 (1991).Google Scholar