Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T09:30:46.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Segregation of in Solutes to High-Angle (001) Twist Grain Boundaries in Al*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

D. Wolf
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
N. Q. Lam
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439
Get access

Abstract

The energies of the Σ = 5, 13, and 17 (001) coincidentsite lattice (CSL) twist boundaries in Al containing small amounts of Zn solutes have been calculated using an iterative energy minimization technique in conjunction with interatomic potentials derived entirely from first principles. By determining both the energies of substitution in the bulk and in different sites in the boundary, the site selectivity for Zn segregation at the grain boundary has been investigated. In the lattice plane immediately near the grain boundary, Zn solutes were found to prefer the lower-symmetry non-coincidence sites while, in the next plane, substitution in the coincidence sites is preferred. The effect of Zn-Zn interactions has also been considered for small solute concentrations. It is found that the magnitude of the Zn-Zn interaction energy is remarkably insensitive to the particular sites occupied by the Zn atoms as well as the detailed geometry of the interface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy.

References

REFERENCES

1. Sutton, A. P. and Vitek, V., Acta Metall. 30, 2011 (1982).Google Scholar
2. Guyot, P. and Simon, J. P., J. de Phys. 36 C4141 (1975).Google Scholar
3. Dagens, L., Rasolt, M., and Taylor, R., Phys. Rev. B11, 2726 (1975).Google Scholar
4. Lam, N. Q., Doan, N. V., and Adda, Y., J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 10, 2359 (1980).Google Scholar
5. Geldart, D. J. W. and Taylor, R., Can. J. Phys. 48, 167 (1970).Google Scholar
6. Vitek, V., Scripta Metall. 9, 611 (1975).Google Scholar
7. Pond, R. C. and Vitek, V., Proc. Roy. Soc. B357, 453 (1977).Google Scholar
8. Wolf, D., Acta Metall. (in press).Google Scholar
9. Taylor, R. (private communication, 1982).Google Scholar
10. Duesbury, M. S., Jacucci, G., and Taylor, R., J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 9, 413 (1979).Google Scholar