Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T08:19:48.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optically Driven Micromanipulation Tools Fabricated by Two-photon Microstereolithography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Shoji Maruo ,
Koji Ikuta  and
Hayato Korogi
Shoji Maruo
Affiliation:
Department of Micro System Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464–8603, Japan
Koji Ikuta
Affiliation:
Department of Micro System Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464–8603, Japan
Hayato Korogi
Affiliation:
Department of Micro System Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464–8603, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Light-driven micromanipulators have been developed by two-photon microstereolithography. The manipulators are driven and controlled by optical trapping. The torque of micromanipulator was successfully controlled on the order of femto-newton by adjusting the focal position of the trapped laser beam. Nanotweezers and a nanoneedle with probe tip of diameter 250 nm were fabricated and driven in a liquid. Such remote-controlled manipulation tools provide a unique and effective handling method of biological samples such as living cell, protein and DNA.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 739: Symposium H – Three-Dimensional Nanoengineered Assemblies , 2002 , H9.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kim, P. and Lieber, C. M., Science 286, p. 2148 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Bøggild, P., et al., Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO 2001), p. 87.Google Scholar
3. Kakushima, K., et al, Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS 2001), p. 294 (2001).Google Scholar
4. Maruo, S. and Ikuta, K., Proc. of the International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators (Transducers 99), p. 1232 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Maruo, S. and Ikuta, K., Proc. of SPIE 3937, p. 106 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Maruo, S., Ikuta, K. and Korogi, H., Proc. of MEMS 2001, p. 594 (2001).Google Scholar
7. Ikuta, K. and Hirowatari, K., Proc. of MEMS 93, 42–47 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Ikuta, K., Hirowatari, K. and Ogata, T., Proc. of MEMS 94, p. 1 (1994).Google Scholar
9. Ikuta, K., Ogata, T., Tsuboi, M., Kojima, S., Proc. of MEMS 96, p. 301 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Maruo, S., Nakamura, O., and Kawata, S., Opt. Lett. 22, p. 132 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Maruo, S. and Kawata, S., J. Microelectromech. Sys. 7, p. 411 (1998).Google Scholar
12. Maruo, S. and Ikuta, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, p. 2656 (2000).Google Scholar