Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T02:30:53.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimizing Nonlinear Properties of Thermal Sprayed Coatings through Processing Parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Yajie Liu
Affiliation:
yalliu@ic.sunysb.edu, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Mechanical Engineering, 006 Light Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stony Brook, NY, 11790, United States
Toshio Nakamura
Affiliation:
toshio.nakamura@sunysb.edu, State University of New York, Mechanical Engineering, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, United States
Vasudevan Srinivasan
Affiliation:
vsriniva@ic.sunysb.edu, State University of New York, Materials Science and Engineering, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, United States
Andrew Gouldstone
Affiliation:
bubbleraft@gmail.com, State University of New York, Materials Science and Engineering, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, United States
Sanjay Sampath
Affiliation:
ssampath@ms.cc.sunysb.edu, State University of New York, Materials Science and Engineering, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, United States
Get access

Abstract

Low-temperature thermal cycling of plasma sprayed zirconia coatings via curvature measurements is used to quantify their nonlinear mechanical behavior. The nonlinear feature arises from the unique layered, porous and cracked morphology of thermal sprayed ceramic materials. With this procedure, various specimens were tested to investigate the effects of processing condition. The measured nonlinear properties are interpreted in the context of microstructural changes in the plasma sprayed coatings due to differences in particle state upon impact and coating build-up. The implications of this study are significant for thermo-mechanical design of strain-tolerant ceramic coatings in thermal barrier applications.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ning, X., Li, C., Li, C. and Yang, G., Vacuum, (2006), p.1261.10.1016/j.vacuum.2006.01.030Google Scholar
2. Brinkiene, K. and Kezelis, R., J Eur Ceram Soc 24, (2004), p.1095.10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00389-3Google Scholar
3. Zhao, L., Maurer, M., Fischer, F., Dicks, R., and Lugscheider, E., Wear 257, (2004), p.41.10.1016/j.wear.2003.07.002Google Scholar
4. Li, M., Christofides, P., Chem Eng Sci 58, (2003), p.849.Google Scholar
5. Thangamani, N., Chinnakali, K. and Gnanam, F., Ceram Int 28, (2002), p.355362.Google Scholar
6. Friis, M., Persson, C. and Wigren, J., Surf Coat Technol 141, (2001), p.115.10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01239-7Google Scholar
7. Kroupa, F. and Plesek, J., Mater Sci Eng A 328, (2002), p.1.10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01653-7Google Scholar
8. Kalman, R., ASME J Basic Eng. 82D, (1960), p.35.10.1115/1.3662552Google Scholar
9. Vaddadi, P., Nakamura, T. and Singh, R. P., Acta mater 51, (2003), p.177.10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00390-7Google Scholar
10. Kulkarni, A., Wang, Z., Nakamura, T., Sampath, S., Goland, A., Herman, H., Allen, J., Ilavsky, J., Long, G., Frahm, J. and Steinbrech, R. W., Acta Mater, 51, (2003), p.2457.10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00030-2Google Scholar