Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T12:42:15.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Particle Deposition, Adhesion, and Removal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

R. P. Donovan ,
T. Yamamoto  and
R. Periasamy
R. P. Donovan
Affiliation:
Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
T. Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
R. Periasamy
Affiliation:
Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Get access

Abstract

Physical forces control particle deposition on wafers in virtually all manufacturing environments: open air, liquid baths, and subatmospheric chambers. Physical forces also often dominate particle adhesion and removal. In aerosol systems, gravity and diffusion are important universal mechanisms contributing to particle deposition velocity (= particle flux to a surface/particle concentration adjacent to that surface). Under appropriate conditions, electrical and thermal forces are also important and sometimes dominating. Both these conditional mechanisms can be introduced so as to minimize particle deposition velocity and thus protect wafers from particulate contamination.

In liquid systems where particle and liquid densities are similar, gravity is a less important particle deposition mechanism. Convective diffusion remains an important mechanism but typically contributes a much lower deposition velocity than in aerosol systems (particle diffusion coefficients are smaller in liquids than in gases). In many liquid systems, electrical forces, arising from particle and surface charging by ion adsorption from the liquid or ionization of surface groups, dominate particle deposition by introducing electrostatic double layer repulsion.

The primary force binding a particle to a surface is van der Waals attraction which is universal and dominating when separation distances between a particle and a surface decrease below I to 2 nm. Van der Waals attractive forces are lower in liquids than in gases so particles are easier to remove in liquids, partly because of this reduced adhesion.

Physical forces—centrifugal, hydrodynamic, vibrational—typically dominate particle removal technology as well. These forces depend directly on fluid density and hence are larger in liquid systems than in gases, another reason why liquid systems remain more successful at particle removal than dry methods.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 315: Symposium Y – Surface Chemical Cleaning and Passivation for Semiconductor Processing , 1993 , 3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Liu, B.Y.H. and Ahn, K.H., “Particle Deposition on Semiconductor Wafers” J. Aerosol Sci. and Tech 6, 215–244 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Peterson, T.W., Scanners, K.M., Stratmann, F., and Fissan, H., “Particle Deposition of Wafers: A Comparison Between Two Modeling Approaches,” J. Aerosol Sci. 19(7):1409–12 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Cooper, D.W., Miller, R.J., Wu, J.J., and Peters, M.N., “Deposition of Submicron Aerosol Particles During Integrated Circuit Manufacturing: Theory,” Particulate Sci. and Tech. 8, 209–224 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Donovan, R.P., Yamamoto, T., Periasamy, R., and Clayton, A.C., “Mechanisms of Particle Transport in Process Equipment” pp. 21–41 in Contamination Control and Defect Reduction in Semiconductor Manufacturing 1, PV 92-21, edited by Schmidt, D.N. (The Electrochemical Society, Inc., 10 South Main St., Pennington, NJ 08534-2896, 1992).Google Scholar
5. Liu, B.Y.H., Fardi, B., and Ahn, K.H., “Deposition of Charged and Uncharged Aerosol Particles on Semiconductor Wafers” pp. 461–465 in 1987 Proceedings of the 33rd ATM of the IES ( IES, 940 E. Northwest Hghwy, Mt. Propect, IL 60065).Google Scholar
6. Batchelor, G.K. and Shen, C., “Thermophoretic Deposition in Gas Flowing over Cold Surface” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 107, 21–37 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Riley, D.J. and Carbonell, R.G., “Mechanisms of Particle Deposition from Ultrapure Chemicals onto Semiconductor Wafers: Deposition from Bulk Liquid during Wafer Submersion,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., to be published (1993).Google Scholar
8. Ranade, M.B., “Adhesion and Removal of Fine Particles on Surfaces,” Aerosol Sci. and Tech. 7(2), 161–176 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Christenson, K., “HF Last Performance in Centrifugal Spray Processors,” pp. 286–293, in Cleaning Technology in Semiconductor Device Manufacturing, PV 92-12, edited by Ruzyllo, J. and Novak, R.A. (The Electrochemical Society, Inc., 10 South Main St., Pennington, NJ 08534-2896, 1992).Google Scholar
10. Israelachvili, J.N., Intermolecular and Surface Forces, Academic Press (1985).Google Scholar
11. Bowling, R.A., “An Analysis of Particle Adhesion on Semiconductor Surfaces,” J. Electrochem Soc. 132(9), 2208–2214 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Burnham, N.A. and Colton, R.J., “Measuring the nanomechnical properties and surface forces of materials using an atomic force microscope,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A7 (4), 2906–2913 (Jul/Aug. 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Hoh, J.H., Cleveland, J.P., Prater, C.B., Revel, J.P., and Hansma, P.K., “Quantized Adhesion Detected with the Atomic Force Microscope,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 4917–4918 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Higashi, G., private communication, reports that the separation force of the AFM is a measure of room relative humidity when force curves are carried out in the open air. He also pointed out to the authors the value of the AFM in measuring surface adhesion forces. (1992).Google Scholar
15. Landman, U., Luedtke, W.D., Burnham, N.A. and Colton, R.J., “Atomistic Mechanisms and Dynamics of Adhesion, Nanoindentation, and Fracture,” Science 248, 454–461 (April 1990).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Burnham, N.A., Colton, R.J., and Pollock, H.M., “Interpretation Issues in Force Microscopy” J. Vac. Sci. Technol A9(4), 2548–2556 (July/August 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Kallay, N., “Adhesion of Fine Particles at Solid/Solution Interfaces,” MRS Bulletin XV(1), 41–47 (January 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Menon, V.B. and Donovan, R.P., “Review of Particle Control Methods during Wet Chemical Cleaning of Silicon Wafers,” in Semiconductor Cleaning Technologyl/989, PV90-9, edited by Ruzyllo, J. and Novak, R.E. (The Electrochemical Society, Inc., 10 S. Main St., Pennington, NJ 08534-2896, 1990), pp. 167–181.Google Scholar
19. Syverson, W.A., Fleming, M.J., and Schubring, P.J., “The Benefits of SC-1/SC-2 Megasonic Wafer Cleaning,” in Cleaning Technology in Semiconductor Device Manufacturing, PV92-12, edited by Ruzyllo, J. and Novak, R.E. (The Electrochemical Society, Inc., 10 S. Main St., Pennington, NJ 08534-2896, 1992), pp. 10–17.Google Scholar
20. Gow, C.J., Smith, R.E., Syverson, W.A., Kunesh, R.F., Buker, E.D., Albaugh, K.B., and Whittingham, L.S., “A Method for Evaluating Cleaning Techniques for the Removal of Particulates from Semiconductor Surfaces” in Cleaning Technology in Semiconductor Device Manufacturing, PV 92-12, edited by Ruzyllo, J. and Novak, R.E. (The Electrochemical Society, Inc. 10 S. Main St., Pennington, NJ 08534-2896, 1992), pp. 366–371.Google Scholar
21. Whitlock, W.H., “Dry Surface Cleaning with CO2Snow,” Fine Particle Society Mtg. Boston, MA, August 22, 1989.Google Scholar
22. McDermott, W.T., Ockovic, R.C., Wu, J.J., and Miller, R.J., “Surface Cleaning by a Cryogenic Argon Aerosol,” in 1991 Proceedings of the IES (IES, 940 E. Northwest Highway, Mt. Prospect, IL 60065, 1991), pp. 882–885.Google Scholar
23. Kanno, I., Ohmori, T., Fukumoto, T., Noguchi, T., and Maeda, Y., “Surface and Back Surface Simultaneous Cleaning by Ice Scrubber Cleaning,” in Microcontamination 91 Proceedings (Canon Communications, Inc., 3340 Ocean Park Blvd, Suite 1000, Santa Monica, CA 90405, 1991), pp. 625–630.Google Scholar
24. Leenaars, A.F.M., “A New Approach to the Removal of Submicron Particles from Solid (Silicon) Substrates,” in Particles on Surfaces 1, edited by Mittal, K.L. (Plenum Press, 1988), pp. 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Leenaars, A.F.M. and O'Brien, S.B.G., “Particle Removal from Silicon Substrates Using Surface Tension Forces,” Philips J. Res. 44, 183–209 (1989).Google Scholar
26. Tam, A.C., Leung, W.P., Zapka, W., and Ziemlich, W., “Laser-Cleaning Techniques for Removal of Surface Particulates,” J. Appl. Phys. 71(1), 3515–3523 (April 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar