Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T11:31:57.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Particle Growth and Development During the In-Situ Precipitation of Silica in a Polymeric Matrix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Ping Xu
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati, Department of Chemistry and the Polymer Research Center, Cincinnati, OH 45221–0172.
Shuhong Wang
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati, Department of Chemistry and the Polymer Research Center, Cincinnati, OH 45221–0172.
James E. Mark
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati, Department of Chemistry and the Polymer Research Center, Cincinnati, OH 45221–0172.
Get access

Abstract

The hydrolysis of tetraethoxysilane much used in the sol-gel approach to ceramics can be studied in a matrix isolation technique in which the silica thus formed precipitates within a polymeric material. This technique was applied here in the in-situ precipitation of silica particles in an elastomeric matrix of poly(dimethylsiloxane). Transmission electron microscopy and mechanical property measurements were carried out as a function of time over a period of 60 days. The equilibrium amount of silica precipitated was obtained relatively quickly, after approximately one day, but reorganization of the particles continued for several days thereafter. This “aging” process resulted in particles that are better defined and more uniform in size, but their ability to reinforce the elastomeric materials was only marginally increased. Scattering techniques are also being used to obtain additional information on this interesting process.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Polmanteer, K. E. and Lentz, C. W., Rubber Chem. Technol., 48, 795 (1975).Google Scholar
2. Dannenberg, E. M., Rubber Chem, Technol., 48, 410 (1975).Google Scholar
3. Wagner, M. P., Rubber Chem. Technol., 49, 703 (1976).Google Scholar
4. Warrick, E. L., Pierce, O. R., Polmanteer, K. E. and Saam, J. C., Rubber Chem. Technol., 52, 437 (1979).Google Scholar
5. Hamilton, J. R., “Silicone Technology”, Interscience, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
6. Mark, J. E. and Erman, B., “Rubberlike Elasticity. A Molecular Primer”, Wiley, New York, 1988, pp. 145153.Google Scholar
7. Mark, J. E. and Pan, S.-J., Makromol. Chem. Rapid Comm., 3, 681 (1982).Google Scholar
8. Ning, Y.-P., Tang, M.-Y., Jiang, C.-Y., Mark, J. E. and Roth, W. C., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 29, 3209 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Jiang, C.-Y. and Mark, J. E., Makromol. Chem., 185, 758 (1984).Google Scholar
10. Jiang, C.-Y. and Mark, J. E., Coll, Polym. Sci., 262, 758 (1984).Google Scholar
11. Ning, Y.-P. and Mark, J. E., Polym. Eng. Sci., 26, 167 (1986).Google Scholar
12. Mark, J. E., Ning, Y.-P., Tang, M.-Y. and Roth, W. C., Polymer, 26, 2069 (1985).Google Scholar
13. Ultrastructure Processing of Advanced Ceramics. ed. by MacKenzie, J. D. and Ulrich, D. R., Wiley, New York, 1988.Google Scholar
14. Ulrich, D. R., CHEMTECH 18, 242 (1988).Google Scholar
15. “Chemistry and Physics of Matrix-Isolated Systems”, ed by Andrews, L. and Moskovits, M., North-Holland Publishers, Amsterdam, 1989.Google Scholar
16. Schaefer, D. W., Jian, L., Sun, C.-C., McCarthy, D., Jiang, C.-Y., Ning, Y.-P., Mark, J. E., and Spooner, S., submitted to “Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Ultrastructure Processing of Ceramics, Glasses, and Composites”, ed. by Ulrich, D. R. and Uhlman, D. R., Wiley, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
17. Schaefer, D. W., Mark, J. E., Jian, L., Sun, C.-C., McCarthy, D., Jiang, C.-Y., and Ning, Y.-P., in Polymer-Based Molecular Composites, ed. by Schaefer, D. W. and Mark, J. E., Mat.Res. Soc., Pittsburgh 1990.Google Scholar
18. Schaefer, D. W. and Mark, J. E., unpublished results.Google Scholar
19. Mark, J. E. and Sullivan, J. L., J. Chem. Phys., 11, 1006 (1977).Google Scholar
20. Llorente, M. A., Andrady, A. L. and Mark, J. E., J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed., 19, 621 (1981).Google Scholar
21. Mark, J. E., J. Polym. Sci.. Macromol. Rev., 11, 135 (1976).Google Scholar
22. Mark, J. E., J., Chem.Educ., 58, 898 (1981).Google Scholar
23. Mark, J. E., Ady Polym. Sci., 44, 1 (1982).Google Scholar
24. Mark, J. E. and Flory, P. J., J. Appl. Phys., 37, 4635 (1966).Google Scholar
25. Xu, Ping, Ph.D. Thesis in Chemistry, University of Cincinnati, 1991.Google Scholar
26. Wiegand, W. B., Can. Chem. J., 4, 160 (1920).Google Scholar
27. Treloar, L. R. G., “The Physics of Rubber Elasticity”, 3rd Ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975, pp. 96.Google Scholar
28. Mark, J. E., Rubber Chem. Technol., 48, 495 (1975).Google Scholar