Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-20T01:19:00.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Positron Annihilation Lifetime Study of Poly(Bisphenol-a Carbonate)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

P. L. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27706
A. J. Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27706
G. W. Pearsall
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27706
J. H. Lind
Affiliation:
Dupont Electronic Testing Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Get access

Abstract

Positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy has proven to be sensitive to glass transitions and other free volume dependent phase transitions in amorphous and semicrystalline polymers. The thermal dependence of the lifetime spectra of positrons in compression-molded poly(bisphenol-A carbonate) has been measured from 253K to 323K, then modelled using a three component fit. The longest-lived component lifetime τ3 was found to vary linearly with increasing temperature independent of thermal history. The corresponding component intensity I3 was found to vary in a non-linear fashion with increasing temperature, exhibiting a significant dependence on thermal history. The observed thermal response of τ3 and I3 is discussed in terms of both molecular relaxation and the ductile-to-brittle transition behavior of poly(bisphenol-A carbonate).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Hull, D. and Owen, T.W., J. Polym. Sci., 11, 2039 (1973).Google Scholar
[2] Parvin, M. and Williams, J.G., J. Mat. Sci., 10, 1883 (1975).Google Scholar
[3] Watts, D.C. and Perry, E.P., Polymer, 19, 248 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Davenport, R.A. and Manuel, A.J., Polymer, 18, 557 (1977).Google Scholar
[5] Ravetti, R., Gerberich, W.W., Hutchinson, T.E., J. Mat. Sci., 10, 1441 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Thakkar, B.S., Polym. Engr. Sci., 21, 155 (1981).Google Scholar
[7] Ryan, J.T., SPE Tech. Paper, 22, 205 (1976).Google Scholar
[8] Allen, G., Morley, D.C.W., Williams, T., J. Mats. Sci., 8, 1449 (1973).Google Scholar
[9] Locati, G. and Tobolski, A.V., Adv. Molec. Relax. Proc., 1, 375 (1970).Google Scholar
[10] Bersted, B.H., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 24, 37 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Broutman, L.J. and Krishnakumar, S.M., Polym. Engr. Sci., 16, 74 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Hill, A.J., M.S. Thesis, Duke University, 1986.Google Scholar
[13] Petrie, S.E.B., J. Macromol. Sci.-Phys., B12, 225 (1976).Google Scholar
[14] Puff, W., Comp. Phys. Commum., 30, 359 (1983).Google Scholar
[15] Malhorta, B.D. and Pethrick, R.A., Eur. Polym. J., 19 457 (1983).Google Scholar
[16] Tant, M.R. and Wilkes, G.L., Polym. Engr. Sci, 21, 874 (1981).Google Scholar
[17] S.Petrie, E.B., J. Polym. Sci., Pt.A-2, 10, 1255 (1972).Google Scholar