Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T15:29:11.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Processing and Characterization of Al2O3 and Al2O3 / Cu Alloy Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

R.C. McCuiston ,
S.C. Danforth  and
D.E. Niesz
R.C. McCuiston
Affiliation:
Department of Ceramics and Materials Engineering Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ 08854, U.S.A.
S.C. Danforth
Affiliation:
Department of Ceramics and Materials Engineering Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ 08854, U.S.A.
D.E. Niesz
Affiliation:
Department of Ceramics and Materials Engineering Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ 08854, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Fused deposition of ceramics (FDC) has been used to fabricate macroscopically graded ceramic skeletons. These Al2O3 skeletons were subjected to binder removal and sintering treatments. The sintered skeletons were infiltrated with copper alloys. Both the skeletons and composites were characterized for micro and macrostructure using scanning electron microcopy. Potential applications for the macroscopically graded ceramic/metal composites focus primarily on impact.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 698: Symposia Q/EE Electroative Polymers and Rapid Prototyping , 2001 , Q2.5.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Mall, S., Hamrick, J.L. II, and Nicholas, T., Mech. Mat. 33, (11) 679 (2001).Google Scholar
2 Pereira, J.M. and Lerch, B.A., Int. J. Impact Eng. 25, [8], 715 (2001).Google Scholar
3 Anderson, C.E. Jr. and Royal-Timmons, S.A., Int. J. Impact Eng. 19, [8] 703 (1997).Google Scholar
4 Espinosa, H.D., Dwivedi, S., Zavattieri, P.D., and Yuan, G., Int. J. Sol. Struct. 35, [22] 2975 (1998).Google Scholar
5 Evans, A.G., Hutchinson, J. W., Fleck, N. A., Ashby, M. F. and Wadley, H. N. G., Prog. Mat. Sci. 47, [3-4] 309 (2001).Google Scholar
6 Prielipp, H., Knechtel, M., Claussen, N., Streiffer, S.K., Müllejans, H., Rühle, M., and Rödel, J., Mat. Sci. Eng. A 197, [1] 19 (1995).Google Scholar
7 Raddatz, O., Schneider, G.A., Mackens, W., Voβ, H., and Claussen, N., J. Eur. Cer. Soc. 20, [13] 2261 (2000).Google Scholar
8 Dai, C., Qi, G., Rangarajan, S., Wu, S., Langrana, N., Safari, A., and Danforth, S. C., in Proceedings of the 7th Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Edited by Bourell, D. L., Beaman, J. J., Crawford, R. H., Marcus, H. L. and Barlow, J. W., (Austin, TX, 1997) pp 411–420.Google Scholar
9 Gonzalez, E.J. and Trumble, K.P., J. Am. Cer. Soc. 79, [1] 114 (1996).Google Scholar
10 Travitzky, N.A., and Shlayen, A., Mat. Sci. Eng. A 244, [2] 154 (1998).Google Scholar