Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T16:19:06.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pulsed Laser Annealing of Aluminum*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

W. R. Wampler
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratoriesϯ, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USA
D. M. Follstaedt
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratoriesϯ, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USA
P. S. Peercy
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratoriesϯ, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USA
Get access

Abstract

Pulsed ruby laser irradiation of unimplanted single crystal and implanted polycrystalline Al has been studied with ion beam analysis and TEM. The results show that Al is melted to a depth of ∼ 0.9 μm with a 4.2 J/cm2 , 15 nsec pulse, and that vacancies are quenched into Al during resolidification. Diffusion of Zn in liquid Al is observed, and a melt time of ∼ 65 nsec is estimated for a 3.8 J/cm2, 30 nsec pulse. The observations are in reasonable agreement with calculations of sample temperature and melt times. We observe no precipitation of AlSb in liquid Al for Sbimplanted Al, and conclude that the nucleation time satisfies 50 nsec ≲ tnuc ≲ 200 nsec. We find no evidence for amorphous Al after irradiation of single crystal Al with energies ≳ 1.5 J/cm2.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

ϯ

A U. S. Department of Energy facility.

*

This work was supported by the U. S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC04-76-DP00789.

References

REFERENCES

1. Laser-Solid Interactions and Laser Processing, 1978, eds. Ferris, S. B., Leamy, H. J. and Poate, J. M., AIP Conference Proceedings No. 50.Google Scholar
2. Laser and Electron Beam Processing of Materials, eds. White, C. W. and Peercy, P. S. (Academic Press, New York, 1980).Google Scholar
3. Wampler, W. R., Follstaedt, D. M. and Picraux, S. T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 36, 366 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Follstaedt, D. M. and Wampler, W. R., Appl. Phys. Lett., in press.Google Scholar
5. Cullis, A., Webber, H. C. and Bailey, P., J. Phys. E. Sci. Instrum. 12, 688 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Mazzoldi, P., Della Mea, G., Battaglin, G., Miotello, A., Servidori, M., Bacci, D. and Jannitti, E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 88 (1980).Google Scholar
7. Buene, L., Poate, J. M., Jacobsen, D. C., Draper, C. W. and Hirvonen, J. K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 37, 385 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Edwards, J. B., Hucke, E. E. and Martin, J. J., Metallurgical Reviews (No. 120) 13, 1 (1968).Google Scholar
9. Peterson, N. L. and Rothman, S. J., Phys. Rev. B1, 3264 (1970).Google Scholar
10. Jain, A. K., Kulkarni, V. N., Sood, D. K., Sundararaman, M. and Yadav, R. D. S., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. 168, 275 (1980).Google Scholar