Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:21:43.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Re-Appraisal of Cavity Growth Processes in Superplasticity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Yan Ma  and
Terence G. Langdon
Yan Ma
Affiliation:
Departments of Materials Science and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1453
Terence G. Langdon
Affiliation:
Departments of Materials Science and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1453
Get access

Abstract

It is well known that cavities are nucleated and grow during the superplastic deformation of many materials. The various theories for cavity growth are examined with special emphasis on the role of growth by diffusion. It is demonstrated that the normal model for the diffusion growth of cavities is inadequate for superplastic materials when the grain boundary lengths are very small. By developing a new model for the growth of an isolated cavity to sizes exceeding the grain size, it is shown that the diffusion process may play a major role in cavity growth under a range of experimental conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 196: Symposium T – Superplasticity in Metals, Ceramics, and Intermetallics , 1990 , 39
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kashyap, B.P. and Mukherjee, A.K., Res Mechanica 17, 293 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Pilling, J. and Ridley, N., Res Mechanica 23, 31 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Langdon, T.G., Metal Sci. 16, 175 (1982).Google Scholar
4. Shei, S.-A. and Langdon, T.G., J. Mater. Sci. 13, 1084 (1978).Google Scholar
5. Miller, D.A. and Langdon, T.G., Metall. Trans. 10A, 1869 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Hancock, J.W., Metal Sci. 10, 319 (1976).Google Scholar
7. Speight, M.V. and Beeré, W., Metal Sci. 9, 190 (1975).Google Scholar
8. Beeré, W. and Speight, M.V., Metal Sci. 12, 172 (1978).Google Scholar
9. Chokshi, A.H. and Langdon, T.G., Acta Metall. 35, 1089 (1987).Google Scholar
10. Miller, D.A. and Langdon, T.G., Scripta Metall. 14, 179 (1980).Google Scholar
11. Schneibel, J.H. and Martinez, L., Scripta Metall. 21, 495 (1987).Google Scholar
12. Ma, Y. and Langdon, T.G., to be published.Google Scholar
13. Ishikawa, H., Bhat, D.G., Mohamed, F.A. and Langdon, T.G., Metall. Trans. 8A, 523 (1977).Google Scholar
14. Ahmed, M.M.I., Mohamed, F.A. and Langdon, T.G., J. Mater. Sci. 14, 2913 (1979).Google Scholar
15. Chokshi, A.H. and Langdon, T.G., Acta Metall. 37, 715 (1989).Google Scholar
16. Maehara, Y. and Langdon, T.G., J. Mater Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
17. Langdon, T.G., JOM (in press).Google Scholar