Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T22:19:17.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recent Progress in The CdTe γ-Rays Detector Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

E. Vittone
Affiliation:
Experim. Physics Dept., Univers. of Torino, Via Giuria 1, Torino, and Sezione INFN, Italy
U. Nastasi
Affiliation:
Radiotherapy Dept., Ospedale S.Giovanni Battista, via S.Massimo 24, Torino, Italy
Get access

Abstract

Recently, we reported a simulation of spectroscopic performances of CdTe detectors by a Monte Carlo program ‘ISIDE’. The program was demonstrated to be extremely useful both for an exact simulation of the spectral response of CdTe to γy-rays and for a detailed understanding of the effect of physical and electronic parameters on the experimental performances. In the present work, the attention is focused on the various aspects of CdTe response to 57Co γ-rays, in an energy interval which is extremely interesting for practical applications of CdTe spectroscopy. Spectra are presented for different experimental conditions, particularly as far as electronics set up is concerned, in correlation with the relevant rise time distributions and with spatial distribution of interaction points in the detector. It is proved that in order to account for the rise times distributions as compared with the experimental ones, one must assume the presence of a dead region on the front of the detector. Moreover, a clear indication of what is needed in order to reach the best energy resolution in realistic conditions is given.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Eisen, Y., Nucl. Instr. Methods in Physics Res. A322, 596 (1992)Google Scholar
[2] Scheiber, C. and Chambron, J., ibidem p. 604 Google Scholar
[3] Glasser, F., Thomas, G., Cuzin, M. and Verger, L., ibidem p. 619 Google Scholar
[4] Nagarkar, V., Squillante, M., Entine, G., Stem, I. and Sharif, D., ibidem p. 623 Google Scholar
[5] Richter, M. and Siffert, P., ibidem p. 529 Google Scholar
[6] A. Kh. Khusainov, ibidem p. 335 Google Scholar
[7] Manfredotti, C., Marchisio, R. and Nastasi, U., ibidem p. 331 Google Scholar
[8] Manfredotti, C. and Nastasi, U., Nucl. Instr. Methods 225, 138 (1984)Google Scholar
[9] Shah, K.S., Lund, J. C. and Olsher, F., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 37, 183 (1990).Google Scholar