Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T05:23:35.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Record of Past Contact Between Altered Rocks and Radioactive Solutions Through Radiation-Induced Defects in Kaolinite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Philippe Ildefonse ,
Jean-Pierre Muller ,
Blandine Clozel  and
George Calas
Philippe Ildefonse
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Minéralogie-Cristallographie, UA CNRS 09, Universités de Paris 6 et 7, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris cedex 05, France
Jean-Pierre Muller
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Minéralogie-Cristallographie, UA CNRS 09, Universités de Paris 6 et 7, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris cedex 05, France ORSTOM, Département T.O.A., 75240 Paris cedex 10, France
Blandine Clozel
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Minéralogie-Cristallographie, UA CNRS 09, Universités de Paris 6 et 7, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris cedex 05, France
George Calas
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Minéralogie-Cristallographie, UA CNRS 09, Universités de Paris 6 et 7, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris cedex 05, France
Get access

Abstract

A U-deposit located in hydrothermally altered tuff in Mexico, and two tropical weathering systems from Brazil and Cameroon were studied as natural analogues of radionuclide release and migration in the geosphere. In these alteration systems, kaolinite is the main secondary phyllosilicate associated with variable amounts of iron oxides. Defect centers are detected in natural kaolinites by means of electron paramagnetic resonance. The origin of the paramagnetic defect centers (PDC) is from radionuclide irradiation. This interpretation is supported by laboratory experiments on kaolinite using four different types of radiation: x-rays, γ-rays, and He+ and Pb2+ ion beam implantations. Several types of PDC (designated A-, A‵- and B-centers) are clearly identified and can be distinguished with respect to their relative stability. The A-center is stable over geological periods (on the order of 109 years) at surface temperatures. Moreover, it is shown that PDC’s in kaolinites reflect the cumulative radiation dose.

PDC’s in kaolinite have been used to trace radionuclide migration in the three natural alteration systems studied. The kaolinites investigated show a significant concentration of PDC’s which corresponds to background natural irradiation. The different types of PDC detected may record successive irradiations of kaolinite directly linked to geochemical conditions prevailing during and after kaolinite growth. Because of their different thermal stability, these different PDC–s may be considered to have formed at different time periods. This makes a unique tool for tracing the dynamics of the transfer of radionuclides and allows the use of kaolinite as an in-situ dosimeter. Because some of the geological settings chosen for nuclear wastes are located in kaolinite-bearing strata, PDC dosimetry could be used in a safety assessment of these wastes.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 212: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIV , 1990 , 749
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Chapman, N.A. and Mc Kinley, I.G., The Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste. (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1987), 280 pp.Google Scholar
[2] OECD, Nuclear Energy Agency, Update on waste management policies and programmes, Nuclear waste bulletin, 3, 86 pp. (1988); Geological disposal of radioactive waste. In situ research and investigations in OECD countries, Nuclear Energy Agency, 126 pp (1988).Google Scholar
[3] Petit, J.C., Radiochim. Acta (1990) in press.Google Scholar
[4] Marfunin, A.S., Spectroscopy, Luminescence and Radiation Centers in Minerals, (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1979), 352 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Coyne, L.M. and McKeever, S.W.S., in Spectroscopic characterization of minerals and their surfaces, edited by Coyne, L.M., McKeever, S.W.S. and Blake, D.F. (American Chemical Society, 1990), ACS Symposium series, 415, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Muller, J. P. and Bocquier, G., in Proceedings of the International Clav Conference. Denver. Colorado, edited by Schultz, L.G., Van Olphen, H. and Mumpton, F.A., (The Clay Minerals Society, Bloomington, Indiana, 1987) pp. 186–196.Google Scholar
[7] Muller, J.P., Ildefonse, Ph. and Calas, G., Clays and Clay Minerals, 38, (1990) in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Calas, Clozel B., Muller, G., Dran, J.P., Hervé, J.C., Chem. Geol. 84, 259 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Clozel, B., unpublished PhD thesis, University Paris VII (1990)Google Scholar
[10] Nambi, K.S.V., Nucl. Tracks 10, 113 (1985).Google Scholar
[11] Bell, W.T., Archeometry 21, 243 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Ildefonse, Ph., Muller, J.P., Cesbron, F. and Sichére, M.C., GSA Abstract with Programs 20, A336 (1989).Google Scholar
[13] Ildefonse, Ph., Muller, J.P., Clozel, B. and Calas, G., Engineering Geology, 29 (1990) in pressGoogle Scholar
[14] Muller, J. P. and Calas, G., Econ. Geol. 84, 694 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Muller, J.P.. Travaux et Documents Microfichés, 50, ORSTOM Paris, 664pp (1988).Google Scholar
[16] Muller, J. P. and Bocquier, G., Geoderma 37, 113 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Bokilo, J. E., Bernat, M., Muller, J. P., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta (1991) submitted.Google Scholar
[18] Hsi, C.K.D. and Langmuir, D., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 49, 1931 (1985).Google Scholar
[19] Boulad, A.P., Muller, J.P. and Bocquier, G., Sci. Géol. Bull. 30, 175 (1977).Google Scholar
[20] Ames, L. L., McGarrah, J. E., Walker, B. A. and Salter, P. F., Chem. Geol. 40, 135 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Benjamin, M. M. and Leckie, J. O., J. Colloid. Interf. Sci., 79, 209 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] Muller, J.P., Clozel, B., Ildefonse, Ph. and Calas, G., Applied Geoch. (1990) in press.Google Scholar