Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T21:25:02.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Results from the Long-Term Interaction and Modeling of SRL-131 Glass with Aqueous Solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Denis M. Strachan ,
L. R. Pederson  and
R. O. Lokken
Denis M. Strachan
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA
L. R. Pederson
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA
R. O. Lokken
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA
Get access

Extract

During the various processing activities in the production of plutonium for the U.S. national defense programs, waste by-products were generated. These wastes, which have been generated over about the past 40 years at sites such as Savannah River Plant in South Carolina and Hanford in Washington, have been stored in underground tanks. Plans for the final disposal of the Savannah River Plan waste have now been documented [1] and call for the decontaminated soluble fraction of the waste to be mixed with cementitious materials and disposed of in near-surface trenches [2]. The radionuclide fraction of the soluble waste and the insoluble fraction of the waste will be converted to glass and sent to a geologic repository. In order for the repository to accept the glass, certain performance criteria must be met. Although not fully defined, it is certain that these criteria will include some specification on the rate of release of nuclides from the glass waste form when contacted by water.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 50: Symposium STOCKHOLM – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX , 1985 , 195
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Department of Energy, DOE Report No. DOE/EIS-0082, 1982.Google Scholar
2. Langton, C.A., Dukes, M.D., and Simmons, R.V., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII, edited by McVay, G.L. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
3. Parkhurst, D.L., Thorstenson, D.C., and Plummer, N.L., US Geological Survey Publication No. USGS/WRI-80–96, 1980.Google Scholar
4. Soper, P.D., et al., Bull. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 62, 1013–1018 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Materials Characterization Center, DOE Report No. DOE/TIC 11400, 1981.Google Scholar
6. Jones, T.E., Rockwell Hanford Operations Report No. RHO-BW-ST-37P, 1982.Google Scholar
7. Strachan, D.M., Pederson, L.R., and Lokken, R.O., Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL) Report No. PNL-SA-12879. 1985.Google Scholar
8. Materials Characterization Center, PNL Report No. PNL-5157, 1985.Google Scholar
9. Marshall, W.L. and Warakomski, J.M., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 44, 915–924, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Grambow, B.E., Glastech. Berich. 56, 566–571, 1983.Google Scholar
11. Weres, O., Yee, A., and Tsao, L., J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 84, 379–402, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Strachan, D.M., Krupka, K.M., and Grambow, B.E., Nuc. Chem. Waste Manag. 5, 87–99, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Grambow, B.E. and Strachan, D.M., in Scientific basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII, edited by McVay, G.L. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1984).Google Scholar
14. Haaker, R.P., Malow, G., and Offermann, P., idib.Google Scholar
15. Crovisier, J. et al, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 47, 377–387, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Crovisier, J. and Gambow, B.E., this volume.Google Scholar