Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T03:35:17.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of Contact Adhesion in Friction and Wear of Graphene under Sliding Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2013

Emil J. Sandoz-Rosado
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, 500 West 120th St Room 220, New York, NY 10027.
Elon J. Terrell*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, 500 West 120th St Room 220, New York, NY 10027.
*
*Corresponding author email: eterrell@columbia.edu
Get access

Abstract

In this study, the failure mechanisms of graphene under sliding are examined using atomistic simulations. A 6nm diameter diamond tip is slid (at a controlled normal load) over a graphene monolayer that is adhered to a semi-infinite silicon substrate. The impact of tip adhesion on the wear and frictional behavior of graphene is studied by comparing two diamond tips, one of which has been hydrogen-passivated and the other which is bare carbon. By contrasting the passivated and unpassivated tips, the interplay of adhesive and abrasive wear on the graphene membrane can also be compared. The results of this work indicate that chemical bonding between the tip and the graphene greatly exacerbates tearing in the graphene monolayer by plowing ahead of the indenter, causing material build-up and increasing effective contact area.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ruan, J. A., and Bhushan, B., in Reprint: Atomic-Scale and Microscale Friction Studies of Graphite and Diamond Using Friction Force Microscopy. United States, 1994), p. 14p.Google Scholar
Perry, M. D., and Harrison, J. A., in 23rd International Conference on Metallurgical Coatings and Thin Films, 22-26 April 1996 (Elsevier, Switzerland, 1996), pp. 211.Google Scholar
Schall, J. D. et al. ., in 2005 World Tribology Congress III, September 12, 2005-September 16, 2005 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Washington, D.C., United states, 2005), pp. 417.Google Scholar
Bhushan, B., Wear 259 (2005).Google Scholar
Sandoz-Rosado, E. J., Tertuliano, O. A., and Terrell, E. J., Carbon 50 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plimpton, S., Journal of Computational Physics 117 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, D. W. et al. ., Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 14 (2002).Google Scholar
Stuart, S. J., Tutein, A. B., and Harrison, J. A., Journal of Chemical Physics 112 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tersoff, J., Phys. Rev. B 37 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berendsen, H. J. C. et al. ., Journal of Chemical Physics 81 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Changgu, L. et al. ., Science 328 (2010).Google Scholar