Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T12:23:09.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Roles for A Precursor Oxide Phase in The Siting, Shaping, and Shrinking of Oxygen Precipitates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

P. Fraundorf*
Affiliation:
Monsanto Electronics Materials Company, St. Louis MO 63167
Get access

Abstract

Three separate “anomalous” effects in the precipitation of oxygen in silicon may be explained if typical poorly-crystallized platelet oxygen precipitates begin as tiny crystalline clusters. The first anomaly, sometimes referred to as the induction effect, may be explained if one postulates the existence of kinetically stable precipitate embryos (seeds) containing no more than one or two oxygen atoms. We show here that such a postulate, coupled with observations, places rather specific constraints on binding energy as a function of size for such tiny clusters. The second and third anomalies, arising in precipitate shape and retrogrowth behavior dependences, respectively, may be explained if one postulates the existence of a relatively dense precursor phase which undergoes first order phase transition, following otherwise classical rules, to the final-stage amorphous oxide normally found. In this case, both precipitate shape and strain field can be interpreted as a barometer of the interstitial ambient during key periods in a precipitate's history.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Schaake, H. F., Baber, S. C. and Pinizzotto, R. F., Semiconductor Silicon 1981, p. 273, eds. Huff, H. R., Kriegler, R. J., and Takeishi, Y., The Electrochem. Soc., Pennington NJ.Google Scholar
2 Fraundorf, P., Fraundorf, G. K. and Shimura, F., J. Appl. Phys., (1985) in press as MS# R7212.Google Scholar
3 Tan, T. Y. and Kung, C. Y., submitted to J. Appl. Phys. (1985) preprint; also Tan, T. Y., Fall Materials Res. Soc. Meeting (abstract), Boston (1985).Google Scholar
4 Osaka, J., Inoue, N. and Wada, K., in Defects and Radiation Effects in Semiconductors, 1980 Conference Series 59, Institute of Physics, Bristol (1980) 527.Google Scholar
5 Fraundorf, G. K., Fraundorf, P., Craven, R. A., Frederick, R. A., Moody, J. W. and Shaw, R. W., J. Electrochem. Soc. 132 (1985) 1701.Google Scholar
6 e.g.Becker, R. and Doring, W., Ann. Phys. 24, 719 (1935).Google Scholar
7. Kelton, K. F., Greer, A. L., and Thompson, C. V., J Chem. Phys. 79, 6261 (1983).Google Scholar
8. Fraundorf, P., Fraundorf, G. K. and Craven, R. A., in VLSI Science and Technlology 1985, p. 436, eds. Bullis, W. M. and Broydo, S., The Electrochem. Soc., Pennington NJ.Google Scholar
9. Patel, e.g. J. R., in Semiconductor Silicon 1981, p. 189, eds. Huff, H. R., Kriegler, R. J. and Takeishi, Y., The Electrochem. Soc., Pennington NJ.Google Scholar
10 Shimura, F., J. Cryst. Growth 54 (1981) 588.Google Scholar
11. Carpenter, R. W., Vanderschaeve, G., Varker, C. J. and Wilson, S. W., Fall Materials Res. Soc. Meeting (abstract), Boston (1985).Google Scholar
12. Tsai, H. L., Carpenter, R. W. and Peng, J. D., Proc. 42nd Annual Meeting Electron Micros. Soc. of Amer., p. 344, ed. Bailey, G. W., San Francisco Press, San Francisco CA (1984).Google Scholar
13. Fraundorf, G. K., private communication.Google Scholar
14. Yasutake, K., Umeno, M. and Kawabe, H., Phys. Stat. Sol. 83 (1984) 207.Google Scholar