Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-15T10:23:34.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Second Harmonic Generation by Polymer Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

P. D. Calvert
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BNI 9QJ, U.K.
B. D. Moyle
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BNI 9QJ, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

Second harmonic generation was observed from composites consisting of 3-nitroaniline or 3-methyl-4-nitroaniline grown within a polymer matrix. In the amorphous polymers, polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate), the crystals formed as fine grains or needles. The intensity of the second harmonic, from Nd-YAG light at 1.06 μm, was measured as a function of the composition from 10–90 wt% of nitroaniline. The angular distribution of the light output was very dependent on the morphology of the precipitate, with a strong concentration of the output in the forward direction for samples containing locally aligned, needle-like crystals. The behaviour in SHG and in light scattering was compared.

Composites with crystalline polymers were prepared as unoriented or oriented films. Nitroanilines and potassiun dihydrogen orthophosphate were crystallised from a number of polymers. The composite structure is governed particularly by the extent of liquid phase miscibility. The potential for optical applications of these materials are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Garito, A.F., Singer, K.D., Tang., C.C. ACS Sym. 223, 1, (1983).Google Scholar
2. Hewig, G.H., Jain., K. Optics Communications 47, 347, (1983).Google Scholar
3. Vizgert, R.V., Davydov, B.L., Kotovshchikov, S.G., Sov., M.P. Starodubtseva. J. Quantum Electron. 12, 214, (1982)Google Scholar
4. Jain, K., Crowley, J.I., Hewig, G.H., Cheng, Y.Y., Twieg., R.J. Optics and Laser Technology 297, 1981.Google Scholar
5. Davydov, B.L., Kotovshchikov, S.G., Sov., V.A. Nefedov. J. Quantum Electron. 7, 129, (1977).Google Scholar
6. Ayers, S., Faktor, M.M., Marr, D., J.L. Stevenson. J. Mat. Sci. 7, 31, (1972).Google Scholar
7. Levine, B.F., Bethea, C.G., Thurmond, C.D., Lynch, R.T., Bernstein., J.L. J. Appl. Phys. 50, 2523, (1979).Google Scholar
8. Lipscomb, G.F., Garito, A.F., Narang., R.S. J. Chem. Phys. 75, 1509, (1981).Google Scholar
9. Moyle, B.D., Ellul, R.E., Calvert., P.D. J. Mat. Sci. Letts. 6, 167, (1987).Google Scholar
10. Zyss., J. J. Molecular Electronics 1, 25, (1985).Google Scholar
11. Kurtz, S.K., Perry., T.T. J. Appl. Phys. 39, 3798, (1968).Google Scholar
12. Dougherty, J.P., Kurtz., S.K. J. Appl. Cryst. 9, 145, (1976).Google Scholar