Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T19:17:19.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selective Attachment of Synthetic DNA to Self-Assembled-Monolayer Functionalized Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Linda A. Chrisey
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering (Code 6900), 4555 Overlook Ave SW, Washington, DC 20375-5348
Paul M. Roberts
Affiliation:
Geo-Centers, Inc., Fort Washington, MD 20744
Valarie I. Benezra
Affiliation:
Geo-Centers, Inc., Fort Washington, MD 20744
Walter J. Dressick
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering (Code 6900), 4555 Overlook Ave SW, Washington, DC 20375-5348
Charles S. Dulcey
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering (Code 6900), 4555 Overlook Ave SW, Washington, DC 20375-5348
Jeffrey M. Calvert
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering (Code 6900), 4555 Overlook Ave SW, Washington, DC 20375-5348
Get access

Abstract

Self-assembled monolayer (SAM) films of organosilanes have been characterized as surfaces for the spatially-controlled, selective attachment of single-stranded synthetic DNA. Geometric patterns of DNA on silica substrates have been created by photochemical modification of the SAMs to produce regions which promote or resist DNA attachment. The attachment of DNA to the modified surfaces was followed using UV spectroscopy, radioassay, ellipsometry, and enzyme-linked colorimetric assay. We have also demonstrated that immobilized DNA is capable of hybridization with a complementary strand under stringent conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Calvert, J.M., in Organic Thin Films and Surfaces, Ulman, A., ed. (Academic Press, Boston) in press.Google Scholar
2. Stenger, D.A., Georger, J.H., Dulcey, C.S., Hickman, J.J., Rudolph, A.S., Nielsen, T.B., McCort, S.M., and Calvert, J.M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 84358442 (1992)Google Scholar
3. Dulcey, C.S., Georger, J.H., Krauthamer, V., Fare, T.L., Stenger, D.A., Calvert, J.M., Science, 1991, 252, 551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Calvert, J.M., Dressick, W.J., Dulcey, C.S., Georger, J.H. Jr., Stenger, D.A., Koloski, T.S., and Calabrese, G.S., Polymer for Migrelectronics, ACS Symposium Series, V. 537, edited by Wilson, C.D., Thompson, L.F., and Tagawa, S., (American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1993) p 210.Google Scholar
5. Geer, R.L., Stenger, D.A., Chen, M.S., Calvert, J.M., Shashidhar, R., Jeong, Y., and Pershan, P., submitted to Langmuir.Google Scholar
6. Chrisey, L.A., Roberts, P.M., Dressick, W., Dulcey, C. and Calvert, J.M., manuscript in preparationGoogle Scholar
7. With the exception of PEDA, each of the organosilanes tested are transparent in the UV signature region for DNA.Google Scholar
8. This an interesting observation given that there are numerous DNA purification methods based on the non-specific adsorption of DNA to silica (e.g., Carter, M.J. and Milton, I.D., Nucl. Acids Res. 21 1044 (1993).Google Scholar
9. The density of molecules in a PEDA SAM may be estimated at 4 × 1014/cm2’ [Uhlman, A., An Introduction to Ultrathin Films: From Langmuir-Blodgett to Self-Assembly (Academic Press, Boston, 1991), pp 256266]. If this value is used to approximate the packing of EDA or DETA SAMs, there is 1 DNA oligomer per 90–100 silane residues in the SAM.Google Scholar
10. Weidlich, T. and Lindsay, S.M., Biopolymers 26, 439453 (1987)Google Scholar
11. Lyubchenko, Y.L., Gall, A.A., Shylakhtenko, L.S., Harrington, R.E., Jacobs, B.L. Oden, P.I. and Lindsay, S.M., J. Biomolec. Struct. Dyn. 10 (3), 589606, (1992)Google Scholar
12. Tm, for the II/III pair was calculated to be 38°C at 0.1XSSC using OLIGO 4.0 software. Annealing temperature may be 5-10°C lower than Tm.Google Scholar