Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T17:19:58.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selfconsistent Analysis of Mobility-Lifetime Products and Subgap Absorption on Different PECVD A-SI:H Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Lihong Jiao
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
S. Semoushikina
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Yeeheng Lee
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
C. R. Wronski
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

The photoconductivity and subband gap absorption measurements over a wide range of generation rate(G) have been carried out ondiluted and undiluted a-Si:H films. It is found that in these high quality films there are significant differences in the functional dependence of mobility-lifetime(μτ) products on G. In additionto the different values of subgap absorption(a) there are also distinct differences in the dependence of a on photon energy (E) as well as G. It is difficult to selfconsistently analyze the results on theundiluted film with the previously used three gaussian distribution, particularly at high generation rates. Selfconsistent analysis isobtained when the (+/0) transitions of negative charged defects andthe (0/-) transitions of positive charged defects are introducedrespectively closer to the valence and conduction bands. This new gapstate distribution is a better representation for the defectpool model and potential fluctuation model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Powell, M.J. and Deane, S.C., Phys. Rev. B 48, 10815 (1993)Google Scholar
2. Schumm, G., Phys. Rev. B 49, 2427 (1994)Google Scholar
3. Hattori, K., Anzai, M., Okamoto, H. and Hamakawa, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 2989 (1995)Google Scholar
4. Dersch, H., Stuke, J., and Beichler, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 38, 456 (1980)Google Scholar
5. Amer, N., Skunamich, A., and Jackson, W.B., Physica 117/118, 897 (1983)Google Scholar
6. Vanacek, M., Stuchlik, J., Kocka, J., and Triska, A., J. Non-Crys. Solids 78/79, 299 (1985)Google Scholar
7. Lee, S., Kumar, S., Wronski, C.R., and Maley, N., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 114, 316 (1989)Google Scholar
8. Dersch, H., Stuke, J., and Beichler, J., Phys. Status Solids(b) 105, 265 (1981)Google Scholar
9. Wronski, C.R. and Daniel, R.E., Phys. Rev. B 23, 794 (1981)Google Scholar
10. Stutzmann, M., Jackson, W.B., and Tsai, C.C., Phys. Rev. B 32, 23 (1985)Google Scholar
11. Gunes, M., Wronski, C. R. and McMahon, T.J., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 2260 (1994)Google Scholar
12. Jiao, L., Liu, H., Semoushikina, S., Lee, Y. and Wronski, C.R., 25th IEEE PVSEC, 1073 (1996)Google Scholar
13. Jiao, L., Liu, H., Semoushikina, S., Lee, Y. and Wronski, C.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 3713 (1996)Google Scholar
14. Mahan, A.H., Nelson, B.P., Salamon, S., and Crandall, R.S., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 219, 673 (1991)Google Scholar
15. Shirai, H., Hanna, J., and Shimizu, I., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 219, 643 (1991)Google Scholar
16. Powell, M.J. and Deane, S.C., Phys. Rev. B 53, 10121 (1996)Google Scholar
17. Branz, H.M. and Silver, M., Phys. Rev. B 42, 7420 (1990)Google Scholar
18. Longeaud, C. and Kleider, J.P., Phys. Rev. B 53, No. 24, R 16133(1996)Google Scholar
19. Shockley, W. and Read, W.T. Jr, Phys. Rev. 87, 835 (1952)Google Scholar
20. Simmons, J.G. and Taylor, G.W., Phys. Rev. B 4, 502 (1971)Google Scholar
21. Liu, H., Jiao, L., Semoushikina, S., and Wronski, C.R., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 198/200, 1168 (1996)Google Scholar