Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T19:37:33.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Si-N Bonding at The SiO2/Si Interfaces During Deposition of SiO2 by the Remote Pecvd Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Y. Ma
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, and Material Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–8202
T. Yasuda
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, and Material Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–8202
S. Habermehl
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, and Material Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–8202
G. Lucovsky
Affiliation:
Departments of Physics, and Material Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–8202
Get access

Abstract

Thin films of SiO2 were deposited on Si substrates by remote PECVD following an in-situ cleaning/surface passivation with atomic-H. Si-N bonds were found in the immediate vicinity of the SiO2/Si interface when nitrous oxide, N2O, was used as O-atom source gas in the remote PECVD process. Si-N bonds, as well as Si-surface roughening produced by H-atom etching, contribute to the formation of high densities of midgap trapping states, Dit ∼1011 cm−2 eV−1, at the SiO2/Si interface. Eliminating the H-atom processing step, and exposing the Si surface to plasma-generated O-atoms prior to the SiO2 deposition: i) eliminated Si-N bonding at the Si/SiO2 interface; ii) reduced midgap Dit to ∼ 1–3×1010 cm−2eV−1 iii) eliminated surface roughening; and iv) improved process latitude and reproducibility.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lucovsky, G., Tsu, D. V., Rudder, R. A., and Markunas, R. J., in Thin Film Processing II, edited by Vossen, J. L. and Kern, W., (Academic Press, 1991). p. 565.Google Scholar
2. Moslehi, M. M., Saraswat, K. C., and Shatas, S. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 1113 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Ahn, J., Ting, W., Chu, T., Lin, S., and Kwong, D. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 283 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Hwang, H., Ting, W., Maiti, B., Kwong, D. L., and Lee, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 1010 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Chu, T. Y., Ting, W., Ahn, J. H., Lin, S., and Kwong, D. L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 1412 (1991).Google Scholar
6. He, S. S., Stephens, D., Ma, Y., Yasuda, T., Habermehl, S, and Lucovsky, G, MRS Symp. Proa, Spring Meeting, 1992.Google Scholar
7. Fountain, G. (private communication).Google Scholar
8. Himpsel, F. J., McFeely, F. R., Taleb-lbrahili, A., Yarmoff, J. A., and Hollinger, G., Phys. Rev. E38, 6084 (1988).Google Scholar
9. Massoud, H. Z., MRS Symp. Proc. 105, 265 (1988).Google Scholar
10. Vasquez, R. P. and Madhukar, A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 998 (1985).Google Scholar
11. Ma, Y., Yasuda, T., Habermehl, S. and Lucovsky, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A10 (1992), to be publishedGoogle Scholar
12. Yasuda, T., Ma, Y., Habermehl, S. and Lucovsky, G., Appl. Phys. Lett., January (1992), to be published.Google Scholar
13. Yasuda, T., Ma, Y. and Lucovsky, G., presented the Fall 1991 MRS meeting.Google Scholar