Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-15T06:56:12.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Solid Freeform Fabrication of Composites by Direct Deposition and by In Situ Mineralization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Paul Calvert
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85712
Jiong Peng
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85712
Chad Souvignier
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85712
Get access

Abstract

Freeform fabrication methods build materials by the repetitive addition of thin layers. This approach can be applied to build parts from epoxy resin which is modified with a gelling agent to solidify the material until curing occurs. High strength and stiffness parts can be obtained through fiber reinforcement but the fiber content is limited by packing effects. We have found that a combination of two types of fibers can be used to achieve higher strength and stiffness than can be obtained from a single fiber type.

An alternative route to reinforcement is to form the reinforcing phase after the material is deposited by an in situ reaction. This approach has been applied to the use of freeform fabrication to make bars of mineralized gel and of methacrylate-silica hybrids. Good mechanical properties can be attained in each case, with up to 50 vol.% inorganic phase and bend strengths in the range from 50-100 MPa.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bigg, D. M., in International Encyclopedia of Composites, edited by Lee, S.M. (VCH, New York, 1991)Google Scholar
2. Currey, J. D., Zioupos, P. and Sedman, A., in Biomimetics, edited by Sarikaya, M. & Aksay, I.A. (AIP Press, Woodbury, NY, 1995) pp. 117144.Google Scholar
3. Calvert, P. D., in Biomimetic Materials Chemistry, edited by Mann, S. (VCH Publishers, Weinheim, Germany, 1996) pp. 315336.Google Scholar
4. Burdon, J., Szmania, J. and Calvert, P., in Hybrid Organic-InorganicC omposites, edited by Mark, J.E., Lee, Y.-C. & Bianconi, P.A. (Am.Chem.Soc., Washington DC., 1995) pp. 618.Google Scholar
5. Burdon, J. and Calvert, P., Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 286, 315320, (1993).Google Scholar
6. Mark, J. E., Polymer Engineering and Science 36, 29052920, (1996).Google Scholar
7. Novak, B. M., Materials Science and Engineering A 162, 257264, (1993).Google Scholar
8. Glimcher, M. J., in Metabolic Bone Disease, edited by Avioli, L.V. & Krane, S.M. (Academic Press, New York, 1998) pp. 2350.Google Scholar
9. Calvert, P. and Crockett, R., Chem. Mater. 9, 650663, (1997).Google Scholar
10. Calvert, P. D., Lin, T. L. and Martin, H., High Performance Polymers 9, 449456, (1997).Google Scholar
11. Milewski, J. V. and Katz, H. S.. Handbook of Reinforcements for Plastics (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, 1987).Google Scholar
12. Calvert, P., Kelly, J. O' and Souvignier, C., Mater. Sci. Eng. C 6, 165174, (1998).Google Scholar