Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-19T11:23:52.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solid-State Nmr Studies of Molecular Composites and Thermally Cured Copolymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

D.L. Vanderhart  and
Loon-Seng Tan
D.L. Vanderhart
Affiliation:
Polymers Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Loon-Seng Tan
Affiliation:
Air-Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio 45433
Get access

Abstract

Proton spin diffusion experiments are conducted on two blends of nylon and poly(phenylenebenzobisthiazole) (PBZT). The blends are prepared different ways and utilize either a semicrystalline or fully amorphous nylon. The spin diffusion experiment, which was conducted using three different schemes, yields information about the shortest distances typifying the individual domains. Results suggest that in a 40/60 nylon 6,6/PBZT blend, the nylon and PBZT molecules do not mix on the molecular level, however, each domain is only about 4 nm in its minimum dimension. At the same time, some crystalline nylon regions also exist having somewhat larger dimensions. In contrast, a 50/50 amorphous nylon/PBZT sample, made via a different processing route, showed evidence for similar mixing in only a portion of the material; there was also strong evidence for compositional heterogeneity on a scale larger than 10 nm. The exact stoichiometries describing this compositional heterogeneity could not be uniquely identified on the basis of the spin diffusion studies alone; however the possibilities range from 55% of pure nylon to 35% of pure PBZT being sequestered from the more intimately mixed phase.

In a second set of experiments, the 250°C thermal polymerization chemistry of a benzocyclobutene (BCB), a bismaleimide (BMI) and an equimolar mixture of BCB and BMI was studied. These materials are candidates for thermally polymerizable matrix materials in blends with rigid-rod polymers like PBZT. Polymerization of the BCB homopolymer is found to involve multiple pathways and there is reasonably strong evidence that the reactive carbons generated by thermal ring opening of the cyclobutene moiety not only attack one another; they also attack aromatic carbons adjacent to carbonyl carbons at sites far from the ring opening reaction. Spectra of the BCB homopolymer aged at 300°C in vacuum indicate that significant chemical changes occur. This result casts a shadow on the interpretation of the good apparent thermogravimetric stability of the BCB homopolymer in air at this temperature. The equimolar mixture of BCB and BMI ideally can polymerize via the Diels-Alder mechanism to produce a linear chain of alternating BCB and BMI repeat units. The spectrum of this thermally polymerized mixture suggests a maximum of 50% of the reaction following the Diels-Alder addition; the other 50% follows homopolymerization pathways.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 134: Symposium J – Materials Science and Engineering of Rigid-Rod Polymers , 1988 , 569
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wiff, D.K., Hwang, W.-F. and Benner, C., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 27, 290 (1982).Google Scholar
2. Bai, S.J., Wiff, D.R. and Hwang, W.-F., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 28, 390 (1983).Google Scholar
3. Kardos, J.L. and Kaisoni, J., Polym. Eng. Sci. 15, 182 (1975).Google Scholar
4. Flory, P.J., Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A234, 73 (1956).Google Scholar
5. Malone, M.F., Hwang, C.F., Gabriel, C.A., Nehme, O.A. and Farris, R.J., Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories Technical Report, AFWAL-TR-87-4048 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Tan, L.-S. and Arnold, F.E., J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed. 26, 1819 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Tan, L.-S. and Arnold, F.E., J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed. 26, 3103 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Certain commercial companies are named in order to specify adequately the experimental procedure. This in no way implies endorsement or recommendation by NIST.Google Scholar
9. Andrew, E.R., Progr. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 8, 1 (1972).Google Scholar
10. Lowe, T.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 85 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Schaefer, J., Stejskal, E.O. and Buchdahl, R., Macromolecules 8, 291 (1975).Google Scholar
12. Ryan, L.M., Taylor, R.E., Paff, A.J. and Gerstein, B.C., J. Chem. Phys. 72, 508 (1980).Google Scholar
13. Haeberlen, U., High Resolution NMR in Solids, (Academic Press, New York, 1976).Google Scholar
14. Rhim, W.-K., Elleman, D.D. and Vaughan, R.W., J. Chem. Phys. 59, 3740 (1973).Google Scholar
15. Mansfield, P., Orchard, J., Stalker, D.C. and Richards, K.H.B., Phys. Rev. B7, 90 (1973).Google Scholar
16. Hartmann, S.R. and Hahn, E.L., Phys. Rev. 128, 2042 (1962).Google Scholar
17. Pines, A., Gibby, M.G. and Waugh, J.S., J. Chem. Phys. 59, 569 (1973).Google Scholar
18. Stejskal, E.O., Schaefer, J. and Waugh, J.S., J. Magn. Reson. 28, 105 (1977).Google Scholar
19. Rhim, W.-K., Elleman, D.D., Schreiber, L.B. and Vaughan, R.W., J. Chem. Phys. 60, 4595 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Opella, S.J. and Frey, M.H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 101, 5854 (1979).Google Scholar
21. VanderHart, D.L., J. Chem. Phys. 84, 1196 (1986).Google Scholar
22. Abragam, A., The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism, (Oxford University Press, London, 1961).Google Scholar
23. Douglass, D.C. and Jones, G.P., J. Chem. Phys. 45, 956 (1966).Google Scholar
24. Havens, J.R. and VanderHart, D.L., Macromolecules 18, 1663 (1985).Google Scholar
25. Cheung, T.T.P. and Gerstein, B.C., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 5517 (1981).Google Scholar
26. Packer, K.J., Pope, J.M., Yeung, R.R. and Cudby, M.E.A., J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Phys. Ed. 22, 589 (1984).Google Scholar
27. VanderHart, D.L., Wang, F.W., Eby, R.K., Fanconi, B.M. and DeVries, K.L., Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories Technical Report, AFWAL-TR-85-4137 (1985).Google Scholar
28. Ostroff, E.D. and Waugh, J.S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 1097 (1966).Google Scholar
29. Powles, J.G. and Mansfield, P., Phys. Lett. 2, 58 (1962).Google Scholar
30. Powles, J.G. and Strange, J.H., Proc. Phys. Soc.London, 82, 6 (1963).Google Scholar
31. VanderHart, D.L., Gutowsky, H.S. and Farrar, T.C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 89, 5056 (1967).Google Scholar
32. Hexem, J. G., Frey, M.H. and Opella, S.J., J. Chem. Phys. 77, 3847 (1982).Google Scholar
33. Zumbulyadis, N., Henrichs, P.M. and Young, R.H., J. Chem Phys. 75, 1603 (1981).Google Scholar
34. Kalinowski, H.-O., Berger, S. and Braun, S., Carbon-13 NMR Spectroscopy, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1988), pp. 199–212.Google Scholar