Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T09:31:13.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stochastic Vacancy Motion in B2 Intermetallics Detected by PAC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Bin Bai
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
Gary S. Collins
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, collins@wsu.edu.
Harmen Thys Nieuwenhuis
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
Mingzhong Wei
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, collins@wsu.edu.
William E. Evenson
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT
Get access

Abstract

Using perturbed angular correlation of gamma rays (PAC), nuclear relaxation has been detected at high temperature in highly ordered B2 intermetallics that is attributed to stochastic motion of vacancies near 111In/Cd probe atoms. The relaxation is of quadrupole interaction signals due to transition-metal vacancies in the first atomic shells of the probes. Possible relaxation mechanisms are reorientation of the vacancy with respect to the probe, detrapping of the vacancy, or trapping of a second vacancy. The relaxation reaches values of 10 MHz at temperatures of 1500K, 1200 K and 1170 K, respectively, for NiAI, FeAl and PdIn. For NiAl and FeAI, the onset of relaxation is abrupt, suggesting an activation enthalpy for the associated vacancy motion of several electron-volts. For PdIn, the relaxation has an activation enthalpy of 1.00(19) eV, a value significantly lower than might be expected naively on the basis of diffusion data. This difference gives insight into vacancy motion and diffusion mechanisms in PdIn.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Recknagel, E., Schatz, G. and Wichert, Th., in Hyperfine Interactions of Radioactive Nuclei, ed. Christiansen, J. (Springer 1983) p. 133.Google Scholar
2. Collins, G.S., Shropshire, S.L. and Fan, J., Hyperfine Interactions 62 1 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Fan, Jiawen, Ph.D dissertation, Washington State University, 1992 (unpublished.Google Scholar
4. Bai, Bin, Fan, Jiawen and Collins, Gary S., this proceeding.Google Scholar
5. Collins, G.S., Sinha, P. and Wei, M., Hyperfine Interactions C1, 380 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Bai, Bin, Ph.D. dissertation, Washington State University, 1997 (unpublished).Google Scholar
7.Probe-vacancy exchange could also lead to relaxation but is ignored in this paper.Google Scholar
8. Evenson, W.E. et al., Hyperfine Interactions 62 283 (1990) and (C)1, 392 (1996).Google Scholar
9.Since the In probe decays into Cd, and it is nuclear relaxation of the Cd daughter that is observed, the probe is strictly not a host-probe. However, it is expected that the disturbance introduced by a Cd probe in PdIn is small.Google Scholar
10. Hahn, H., Frohberg, G. and Wever, H., Physica Status Solidi (a) 79, 559 (1983).Google Scholar
11. Philibert, Jean, Atom movements: diffusion and mass transport in solids, translated by Rothman, Steven J. (Les Editions de Physique 1991).Google Scholar
12. Wang, R., Gardner, J.A., Evenson, W.E. and Sommers, J.A., Phys. Rev. B47 638 (1993).Google Scholar