Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T05:26:47.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strain Relaxation in Thin Films: the Effect of Dislocation Blocking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Peter J Goodhew
Peter J Goodhew*
Affiliation:
Materials Science & Engineering, Department of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GH, UK
Get access

Abstract

The relaxation of strained layers frequently occurs by the glide of threading dislocations. From very early on in the relaxation process, gliding dislocations will be forced to intersect a number of prior dislocations with almost-perpendicular line directions and their progress may be blocked. This effect has been widely reported in semiconductor films, and there is some experimental evidence that it is reduced when layers are grown on vicinal substrates. This implies that the blocking is sensitively dependent on the dislocation configuration and in particular on the dislocation line directions.

In this paper the interactions between gliding threading dislocations and the perpendicular or nearly-perpendicular dislocation in their path are modelled quantitatively. The differences arising from different initial dislocation configurations and different predominant line directions are found to be small. Strain relaxation, at least in its early stages, should be virtually independent of the initial dislocation configuration.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 594: Symposium V – Thin Films - Stresses & Mechanical Properties VIII , 1999 , 93
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dodson, B.W. and Tsao, Y J, Appl. Phys. Lett., 51, 1325–1327 (1987) & erratum, ibid, 52, 852 (1988)Google Scholar
2. Beanland, R., Dunstan, D.J. and Goodhew, P.J., Adv. Physics 45, 87–146 (1996)Google Scholar
3. Beanland, R., J Appl. Phys., 72, 4031–4035 (1992)Google Scholar
4. Freund, L.B., J. Appl. Phys., 68, 2073–2080 (1990)Google Scholar
5. MacPherson, G. and Goodhew, P.J., Appl. Phys. Lett., 70, 2873–2875 (1997)Google Scholar
6. Samavedam, S.B. and Fitzgerald, E.A., J. Appl. Phys., 81, 3108 (1997)Google Scholar
7. Liliental-Weber, Z., Chen, Y., Werner, P., Zakharov, N., Swider, W., Washburn, J., Klemi, J.F. and Tsao, J.Y., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 11, 1379–1383 (1993)Google Scholar
8. Goldman, R.S., Wieder, H.H. and Kavanagh, K.L., Appl. Phys. Lett., 67, 344–346 (1995)Google Scholar
9. Kightley, P., Goodhew, P.J., Bradley, R.R. and Augustus, P.D., J. Crystal Growth 112, 359–367 (1991)Google Scholar
10. MacPherson, G., Goodhew, P.J. and Beanland, R., Phil. Mag. A72, 1531–1545 (1995)Google Scholar
11. Goodhew, P.J., Phil Mag, in press (1999)Google Scholar
12. Krishnamoorty, V., Lin, Y.W., Calhoun, I., Lui, H.L. and Park, R.M. Appl. Phys. Lett., 61, 2680 (1992)Google Scholar
13. Goodhew, P.J. and Giannakopoulos, K.P., Micron 30, 59–64 (1999)Google Scholar
14. Giannakopoulos, K.P. and Goodhew, P.J., J. Crystal Growth, 188, 26–31 (1998)Google Scholar