Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-5mhkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-16T21:49:04.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structure Analysis of Co/Re Superlattice Grown on an Al2O3 (110) Substrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Wentao Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
Timothy Charlton
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, USA Department of Physics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
Lance E. De Long
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
David Lederman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
Get access

Abstract

The structure of a Re(5 nm)/(Co(2 nm)/Re(3 nm))19 sample grown via magnetron sputtering was thoroughly analyzed via x-ray reflectivity (XRR) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Cross-sectional TEM results indicate that the sample is epitaxial, with the in-plane c-axis of the superlattice pointing along the c-axis of the substrate. A quantitative analysis of XRR yielded an average thickness of each layer and an interface roughness ∼ 0.4 nm between the Co and Re layers. A careful analysis of the TEM data reveals that the in-plane lattice parameters for Co, Re and Al2O3 are approximately 0.24 nm, 0.43 nm; 0.26 nm, 0.44 nm; and 0.24 nm, 0.44 nm, respectively. The lattice spacings of Al2O3 correspond to a/2 and c/3, where a, and c are lattice parameters, respectively. Interestingly, both high resolution and Z-contrast images show a very uniform period thickness. Z-contrast images, however, show that the initial interface roughness between the Re buffer layer and the first Co layer is amplified as the layers get farther away from the substrate. A high magnification TEM analysis shows that the bottom Co-Re interface roughness is about 0.2 nm, whereas the top Re-Co interface roughness is about 0.7 nm. Previous anistropic magnetoresistance measurements are discussed in light of these new structural data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERECES

1. Fullerton, E. E., Kelly, D. M., Guimpel, J., and Schuller, I. K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 859 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Parkin, S. S. P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1641 (1993).Google Scholar
3. Pierce, D. T., Unguris, J., Celotta, R. J., and Stiles, M. D., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200, 290 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Dieny, B., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 136, 335 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Charlton, T., Lederman, D., Yusuf, S. M., and Felcher, G. P., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 4436 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Charlton, T., McChesney, J., Lederman, D., Zhang, F., Hilt, J. Z., and Pechan, M. J., Phys. Rev. B 59, 11897 (1999).Google Scholar
7. Charlton, T. and Lederman, D., Phys. Rev. B 63, 94404 (2001).Google Scholar
8. Burgei, W., Pechan, M. J., Charlton, T. and Lederman, D., J. Appl. Phys. 91, 7529 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Grundy, P. J., J. Alloys and Compounds 326, 226 (2001).Google Scholar
10. Lauter, H., Lauter-Pasyuk, V., Toperverg, B., Romashev, L., Milyaev, M., Krinitsina, T., Kravtsov, E., Ustinov, V., Petrenko, A., and Aksenov, V., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 258259, 338 (2003).Google Scholar