Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T21:53:49.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structure and Properties Changes During Ion Bombardment of Crystalline Fe75B25

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A.E. Berkowitz
Affiliation:
General Electric Company, Corp. R&D, Schenectady, NY 12301 U.S.A.
W.G. Johnston
Affiliation:
General Electric Company, Corp. R&D, Schenectady, NY 12301 U.S.A.
A. Mogro-Campero
Affiliation:
General Electric Company, Corp. R&D, Schenectady, NY 12301 U.S.A.
J.L. Walter
Affiliation:
General Electric Company, Corp. R&D, Schenectady, NY 12301 U.S.A.
H. Bakhru
Affiliation:
SUNY at Albany, Albany, NY 12222, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Ribbons of Fe75B25, prepared by quenching from the melt, were mostly amorpbous. After annealing at 773 K, the ribbons were entirely crystalline, with the phases Fe3B, Fe2B and α - Fe. Annealed ribbons were bombarded at RT with 4 MeV argon ions, at a damage rate of 7 × 10−4 dpa sec−1 near the surface. The Fe3B was completely converted to an amorphous form at 0.15 dpa, the lowest damage level at which amorphization of a metal alloy has been reported. The Fe2B disappeared by about 1.5 dpa. The α -Fe disappeared between 17 and 50 dpa, apparently by ion beam mixing rather than direct amorphization. Amorphous films also were prepared by sputtering at low power level, and crystallized at 773 K, which also caused sintering. Bombardment with argon ions produced major changes in resistivity and magnetic coercive force at the same low damage levels that caused amorphization of Fe3B Hc of the bombarded film was the same as in an as-quencheo amorpous ribbon. The relatively high resistivity of as sputtered amorphous film was apparently due to the porosity in the columnar cell walls. With present technology, it should be possible to produce amorphous films or structures of Fe3B at rates approaching 50 m2 hr−1.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bloch, J., J. Nuclear Mat. 2, 203 (1962).Google Scholar
2.Lesueur, D., Comptes Rendus B266, 1038 (1968).Google Scholar
3.Howe, L.M. and Rainville, M.H., J. Nucl. Mater. 68, 215 (1977).Google Scholar
4.Rechtin, M.D., Vander Sande, J. and Baldo, P.M., Scripta Met. 12, 634 (1978).Google Scholar
5.Brimhall, J.L., Charlot, L.A. and Wang, R.Scripta Met. 13, 217 (1979).Google Scholar
6.Manning, I. and Mueller, G.P., Computer Phys. Comm. 7, 85 (1974).Google Scholar
7.Walter, J.L., Rao, P., Koch, E.F. and Bartram, S.F., Met. Trans. 8A, 1141 (1977).Google Scholar
8.Howe, L.M. and Rainville, M.H., Rad. Effects 48, 151 (1980).Google Scholar
9.Thornton, J.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 11, 666 (1974).Google Scholar