Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T05:26:47.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study of Polyethers/Lii Systems by Addition of Alumina Ceramic Powders Prepared by Two Synthesis Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. A. Ribeiro
Affiliation:
Lab. de Materiais, Depto de Quimica, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, MG, Brazil e-mail: nelcy@apolo.qui.ufmg.br
G. G. Silva
Affiliation:
Lab. de Materiais, Depto de Quimica, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, MG, Brazil e-mail: nelcy@apolo.qui.ufmg.br
N. D. S. Mohallem
Affiliation:
Lab. de Materiais, Depto de Quimica, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, MG, Brazil e-mail: nelcy@apolo.qui.ufmg.br
Get access

Abstract

Composites of alumina ceramic powders prepared by co-precipitation and sol-gel methods with Lithium Iodide based polymer electrolytes are described. The polyether matrices Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and block copolymer Poly(propylene glycol-ethylene glycolpropylene glycol) (Triblock) with Lil in a ratio [O]:[Li] = 20:1 are used with up to 17 wt% of α-A1203 (medium grain size). Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) studies show that Tg values for PEO based composites are higher whereas those for Triblock based composites are lower than the Tg value of the polymer/salt system.

Conductivity measurements as a function of temperature show that there is no significant change in conductivity above the melting points for the electrolytes after α-A1203 powder addition (σ approximately 10−3 S.cm−l at 100°C), whereas better mechanical properties are observed for the ceramic reinforced samples. An increase in conductivity is obtained for the Triblock based composites near room temperature as a consequence of the lower melting point of these materials (26°C) in comparison to the PEO based composites (54°C).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wieczorek, W., Florjanczyk, Z. and Stevens, J. R., Electrochimica Acta, V.40, N.13-14, 1995, pp.2251–58.Google Scholar
2. Plocharski, J., Wieczorek, W. and Such, K., Applied Physics A, V.49, 1989, pp. 5560.Google Scholar
3. Plocharski, J. and Wieczorek, W., Solid State Ionics, V.28–30, 1988, pp.979–82.Google Scholar
4. Capuano, F., Croce, F. and Scrosati, B., Journal. of Electrochemistry Society, V. 138, N.7, 1991, pp. 1918–22.Google Scholar
5. Choi, Byoung-Koo and Shin, Kyoung-Hee, Solid State Ionics, V.86–88, 1996, pp.303–6.Google Scholar
6. Armand, M. B., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci., V.16, 1986, pp.245–61.Google Scholar
7. Weston, J. E. and Steele, B. C. H., Solid State Ionics, V.7, 1982, pp. 75–9.Google Scholar
8. Mendolia, M. S., and Farrington, G. C., Materials Chemistry-an emerging Discipline; Interrante, L.V., Caspar, C.A., Ellis, A. B., Eds; ACS: Washington, DC, 1995, pp. 107.Google Scholar
9. Lowell, S. and Shields, J. E., Powder Surface Area and Porosity, John Wiley, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
10. Gray, F.M., “Polymer Electrolytes”, RCS Materials Monographs, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1997.Google Scholar
11. Wieczoreck, W., Such, K., Florjanczyk, Z. and Stevens, J.R., J. Phys. Chem., V.98, 1994, 68406850.Google Scholar