Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T06:20:03.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Superplastic Foaming of Titanium and Ti-6Al-4V

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

D. C. Dunand
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA, dunand@nwu.edu.
J. Teisen
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zürich, Switzerland.
Get access

Abstract

Solid-state foaming of metals can be achieved by hot-isostatic pressing of powders in presence of argon followed by expansion of the resulting high-pressure argon bubbles at ambient pressure and elevated temperature. This foaming technique was first demonstrated by Kearns et al. [1] for Ti-6Al-4V, but is limited by its low creep rate and ductility, which lead to early cell wall fracture. We address these issues by performing the foaming step under superplastic conditions. Rather than using microstructural superplasticity (requiring fine grains which are difficult to achieve in porous powder-metallurgy materials), we used transformation superplasticity, which occurs at all grain sizes by biasing with a deviatoric stress (from the pore pressure) of internal stresses (from the allotropic mismatch during thermal cycling about the allotropic temperature range). As compared to control experiments performed under isothermal creep conditions, superplastic foaming under temperature cycling of unalloyed titanium and alloyed Ti-6Al-4V led to a significantly higher pore volume fraction and higher foaming rate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kearns, M.W., Blenkinsop, P.A., Barber, A.C., and Farthing, T.W., Intern. J. Powder Metall. 24, p. 59 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Dunand, D.C. and Myojin, S., Mater. Sci. Eng. 230, p. 25 (1997).Google Scholar
3. Greenwood, G.W. and Johnson, R.H., Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. 283A, p. 403 (1965).Google Scholar
4. Chaix, C. and Lasalmonie, A., Res Mech. 2, p. 241 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Dunand, D.C. and Bedell, C.M., Acta Mater. 44, p. 1063 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Furushiro, N., Kuramoto, H., Takayama, Y., and Hori, S., Trans. ISIJ 27, p. 725 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Leriche, D., Gautier, E., and Simon, A., in Sixth World Conference on Titanium (1988), p. 163.Google Scholar
8. Nieh, T.G., Wadsworth, J., and Sherby, O.D., Superplasticity in Metals and Ceramics, Cambridge, 1997, pp. 213216.Google Scholar
9. Dunand, D.C., in International Conference on Thermomechanical Processing of Steels and Other Materials, edited by Chandra, T. and Sakai, T. (TMS, Warrendale, 1997), p. 1821.Google Scholar
10. Szliniarz, W. and Smolka, G., J. Mater. Proc. Tech. p. 413 (1995).Google Scholar
11. Metals Handbook: Metallography and Microstructures, ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1985, pp. 464468.Google Scholar
12. Frost, H.J. and Ashby, M.F., Deformation-Mechanism Maps: The Plasticity and Creep of Metals and Ceramics, Pergamon Press, 1982, p. 44.Google Scholar