Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T23:15:59.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface Melting and Surface Diffusion on Clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Hai-Ping Cheng  and
R. Stephen Berry
Hai-Ping Cheng
Affiliation:
The University of Chicago, Department of Chemistry, 5735 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637
R. Stephen Berry
Affiliation:
The University of Chicago, Department of Chemistry, 5735 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Get access

Abstract

Surface melting on clusters is investigated by a combination of analytic modeling and computer simulation. Homogeneous, argon-like clusters bound by Lennard-Jones forces and Cu-like clusters bound by ‘embedded atom’ potentials are the systems considered. Molecular dynamics (MD) calculations have been carried out for clusters with 40–147 atoms. Well below the bulk melting temperature, the surfaces become very soft, exhibiting well-defined diffusion constants even while the cores remain nearly rigid and solid-like. The simulations, particularly animations, of atomic motion reveal that the surface melting is associated not with amorphous, random surface structures in constant, irregular motion, but rather in large-amplitude, organized, collective motion of most of the surface atoms accompanied by a few “floaters” and holes. At any time, a few of the surface atoms move out of the surface layer, leaving vacancies; these promoted particles wander diffusively, the holes also but less so, and occasionally exchange with atoms in the surface layer. This result is the basis for an analytic, statistical model. The caloric curves, particularly the latent heats, show that surface melting of clusters is a “phase change” different from the bulk melting of clusters.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 206: Symposium G – Clusters and Cluster-Assembled Materials , 1990 , 241
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Strandburg, K., Revs. Mod. Phys. 60, 161 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Ubbelohde, A. R., The Molten State of Matter (Wiley, New York, 1978), and references therein.Google Scholar
3. Frenken, J. W. M. and van der Veen, J. F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 134 (1985); for another sort of surface melting in a doped cluster,Google Scholar
see Bösiger, J. and Leutwyler, S., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1895 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Abraham, F. F. and Broughton, J. Q., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 734 (1986).Google Scholar
5. Lipowsky, R. and Speth, W., Phys. Rev. B 28, 3983 (1983);Google Scholar
Jayanthi, C. S., Tosatti, E. and Pietronereo, L., Phys. Rev. B 31, 3456 (1985);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löwen, H., Beier, T. and Wagner, H., Europhys. Lett. 9, 791 (1989);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ibid., Z. Phys. B 79, 109 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Pavlovska, A., Faulian, K. and Bauer, E., Surf. Sci. 221, 233 (1989);Google Scholar
Löwen, H., Surf. Sci. 234, 315 (1990).Google Scholar
7. c.f. Berry, R. S., Beck, T. L., Davis, H. L. and Jellkiek, J., in Evolution of Size Effects in Chemical Dynamics, Part 2, Prigogine, I. and Rice, S. A., eds., Adv. Chem. Phys. 70, Part 2, 75 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Briant, C. L. and Burton, J. J., J. Chem. Phys. 63, 2045 (1975).Google Scholar
9. Nauchitel, V. V. and Pertsin, A. J., 40, 1341 (1980).Google Scholar
10. c.f. Physics and Chemistry of Small Clusters, Sugano, S., Nishina, Y. and Ohnishi, S., eds. (Springer,-Verlag New York, 1987);Google Scholar
Elemental and Molecular Clusters, Benedek, G. and Pacchioni, M., eds. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988).Google Scholar
11. Gear, C.W., Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations, (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1971).Google Scholar
12. Nosé, S., Mol. Phys. 52, 255 (1984);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ibid., J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511 (1984).Google Scholar
13. See Cheng, H.-P., Dutta, P. and Ellis, D.E. and Kalia, R., J.Chem. Phys. 85, 2232 (1986) for the general method of truncating a potential energy function. The cutoff distance here is chosen to include the third nearest neighbor interaction.Google Scholar
14. Nørskov, J. K., Phys. Rev. B 26, 2875 (1982);Google Scholar
Daw, M. S. and Baskes, M. I., Phys. Rev. B 29, 6443 (1984);Google Scholar
Foiles, S. M., Baskes, M. I. and Daw, M. S., Phys. Rev. B 33, 7983 (1986).Google Scholar
15. Berry, R. S., Cheng, H.-P. and Rose, J., High Temp. Sci. 27, 61 (1990);Google Scholar
Berry, R. S., Braier, P., Hinde, R. J. and Cheng, H.-P., Israel J. Chem. 30, 39 (1990).Google Scholar
16. Jellinek, J. and Li, D. H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 241 (1989).Google Scholar
17. Berry, R. S. and Wales, D. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1156 (1989);Google Scholar
Wales, D. J. and Berry, R. S., J. Chem. Phys. 92, 4473 (1990).Google Scholar
18. Braier, P., Berry, R. S. and Wales, D. J., J. Chem. Phys. (in press).Google Scholar