Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T20:14:11.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tensile Fracture Behavior of a Cast Gamma-Titanium Aluminide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

V. Seetharaman ,
R. L. Goetz  and
S. L. Semiatin
V. Seetharaman
Affiliation:
UES, Inc., Dayton, OH 45432
R. L. Goetz
Affiliation:
UES, Inc., Dayton, OH 45432
S. L. Semiatin
Affiliation:
Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH 43201
Get access

Abstract

The fracture behavior of a cast gamma-titanium-aluminide alloy (Ti-49.5A1–2.5Nb-l. 1Mn) during deformation processing was investigated using hot-tension testing and isothermal-forging experiments. In uniaxial tension, fracture ductility increased with an increase in the test temperature and a decrease in the imposed strain rate. During open-die forging of this alloy under isothermal conditions, tensile stresses generated due to frictional effects and the associated inhomogeneous plastic deformation led to free-surface fracture via intergranular cracking. The failure observations under these two deformation modes were correlated successfully using a tensile-damage criterion.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 213: Symposium Q – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys IV , 1990 , 895
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Semiatin, S. L., in Workability Test Techniques, edited by Dieter, G. E. (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1984), p. 197.Google Scholar
2. Semiatin, S. L. and Piehler, H. R., Met. Trans. A 10A, 97 (1979).Google Scholar
3. Crockcroft, M. G. and Latham, D. J., NEL Report No. 240, National Engineering Laboratory, East Kilbridge, Glasgow, 1966.Google Scholar
4. Semiatin, S. L., Holbrook, J. H., and Mataya, M. C., Met. Trans. A 16A, 145 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Seetharaman, V. and Lombard, C. M., To be published in Proceedings of Microstructure/PropertM Relationships in Titanium Alloys and Titanium Aluminides (Detroit, MI, 1990) (The Metallurgical Society, Warrendale, PA, 1991).Google Scholar
6. Oh, S. I., Inter. J. Mech. Sci. 24, 479 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Lipsitt, H. A., Shechtman, D., and Schafrik, R. E., Met. Trans. A 6A 1991 (1975).Google Scholar
8. Koeller, R. C. and Raj, R., Acta. Met. 26, 1551 (1978).Google Scholar
9. McQueen, H. J.,and Jonas, J. J. in Treatise on Materials Science and Technology. Vol 6: Plastic Deformation of Metals, edited by Arsenault, R. J. (Academic Press, New York, 1975), p. 393.Google Scholar