Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T12:20:05.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal, Viscoplastic Analysis of Composite Laminates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

E. Krempl
Affiliation:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Mechanics of Materials Laboratory, Troy, NY 12180-3590
K. D. Lee
Affiliation:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Mechanics of Materials Laboratory, Troy, NY 12180-3590
Get access

Abstract

For the modeling of ply deformation behavior the orthotropic, thermal viscoplasticity theory based on overstress is used. It can represent creep, relaxation and rate sensitivity as well as monotonic and cyclic loadings. The theory is “unified” since creep and plasticity are not separately modeled. No yield surfaces and loading/unloading conditions are employed. The laminate theory for in-plane loading maintains the geometric assumptions of classical laminate theory. The elasticity law, however, is replaced by the thermal, orthotropic viscoplasticity law. Numerical experiments illustrate the predictions of the theory for an angle-ply and a cross-ply laminate subjected to a temperature increase, temperature hold and subsequent return to the original temperature. The ply and laminate stresses are calculated as a function of time for unconstrained and constrained conditions using postulated properties close to a real metal matrix composite. Redistribution of ply stresses and relaxation are found. In some cases, nearly permanent residual ply stresses are present after completion of the temperature cycle.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dvorak, G. J., in Mechanics of Composite Materials: Recent Advances (Proc. IUTAM Symposium on Mechanics of Composite Materials, Pergamon Press, Inc., New York, NY, 1982).Google Scholar
2. Krempl, E., Welding Research Council Bulletin No. 195 (Welding Research Council, New York, NY, 1974).Google Scholar
3. Miller, A. K., editor, Unified Constitutive Equations for Creep and Plasticity (Elsevier Applied Science, London and New York, 1987).Google Scholar
4. Kujawski, D. and Krempl, E., J. Appl. Mech. 48, 55 (1981).Google Scholar
5. Kujawski, D., Kallianpur, V. and Krempl, E., J. Mech. Phys. Solids 28, 129 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Yao, D. and Krempl, E., Int. J. of Plasticity 1, 259 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Krempl, E., McMahon, J. J. and Yao, D., Mech. of Materials 5, 35 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Sutcu, M., PhD Thesis (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, December 1985).Google Scholar
9. Sutcu, M. and Krempl, E., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Report MML87-8, September 1987, submitted for publication.Google Scholar
10. Krempl, E. and Hong, B.-Z., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Report MML87-9, September 1987, submitted for publication.Google Scholar
11. Tsai, S. W. and Hahn, H. T., Introduction to Composite Materials (Technomic Publishing Co., Westport, CT, 1980).Google Scholar
12. Lee, K. D. and Krempl, E., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Report MML 88–1, April 1988.Google Scholar
13. Lee, K. D. and Krempl, E., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Report MML 88–2, May 1988.Google Scholar