Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T10:22:46.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transient Current and Transient Capacitance Measurements of Defects in AlGaAs Hemts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

R. Magno
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375
R. Shelby
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375
Get access

Abstract

The defects present in AlGaAs high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) devices subjected to accelerated lifetime tests have been studied by transient current, and when possible, by transient capacitance techniques. By measuring transient source-drain currents following the application of a voltage pulse to the gate it is possible to perform deep level transient spectros-copy (DLTS) experiments on HEMT devices which are too small for the conventional capacitance DLTS. The capacitance and current spectra for both stressed and unstressed HEMTs contain the AlGaAs DX defect. The current DLTS spectra for stressed devices contain an additional feature which is not found in capacitance DLTS measurements on the stressed HEMTs. This additional current DLTS feature is anomalous in that the transient has a sign which is opposite to that expected for a majority carrier trap. The absence of the new defect in the capacitance DLTS suggests that the defect is located in the channel between the gate and either the source or the drain. The current DLTS line shape of the stressed induced defect depends upon the polarity and size of the source-drain voltage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Magno, R., Shelby, R., and Anderson, W. T., J. Appl. Phys. 66, 5613 (1989).Google Scholar
2 Lang, D. V., J. Appl. Phys. 45, 3023 (1974).Google Scholar
3 Zylbersztejn, A., Bert, G., and Nuzillat, G., Inst. of Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 45, edited by Wolfe, C. M. (IOP, Bristol, 1979) p. 315.Google Scholar
4 Blight, S. R., Wallis, R. H., and Thomas, H., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices Ed–33, 1447 (1986).Google Scholar
5 For a recent review of DX see Mooney, P. M., Defects in Electronic Materials, edited by Stavola, M., Pearton, S. J., and Davies, G. (Mater. Res. Soc., Pittsburgh, PA 1988), p.56l.Google Scholar
6 Valois, A. J. and Robinson, G. Y., IEEE Electron Device Letters EDL–4, 360 (1983).Google Scholar
7 Maracas, G. N., Laidig, W. D. and Wittman, H. R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B2, 599 (1984).Google Scholar