Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T19:28:34.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Very Low Deep Level AlxGa1−xAs (x=0.22) Layer Grown by Metalorganic Chemical Vapor Deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Z. C. Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21228
Bing Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21228
H. K. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21228
J. C. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21228
Get access

Abstract

We have achieved deep-level-free Al0.22Ga0.78As epitaxial layers using low selenium (Se)-doping (8.4 × l016 cm−3) grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). Deep levels in various Al0.22Ga0.78As layers grown on GaAs substrates were measured by deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS). We have found that the commonly observed oxygen contamination-related deep levels at EC-0.53 and 0.70 eV and germanium-related level at EC-0.30 eV in MOCVD-grown Al0.22Ga0.78 As can be eliminated by low Se-doping. In addition, a deep hole level located at Ev+0.65 eV was found for the first time in highly Se-doped Al0.22Ga0.78 As epilayers. We suggest that low Se-doping (<2 × 1017 cm−3) produces a passivation effect and then deactivates other deep levels in Al0.22Ga0.78As.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lang, D.V., Logan, R.A., and Jaros, M., Phys. Rev. B 19, 1015 (1979)Google Scholar
2. Bhattacharya, P.K., Subramanian, S. and Ludowise, M.J., J. Appl. Phys., 55, 3664 (1984)Google Scholar
3. Green, R.T. and Lee, W.-I., J. Electron. Mater., 20, 583 (1991)Google Scholar
4. Kobayashi, K., Yamaga, M., Fujimoto, I. and Suzuki, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 28, L1073 (1989)Google Scholar
5. Ishikawa, T., Maeda, T. and Kondo, K., Appl. Phys. Lett., 53, 1926 (1988)Google Scholar
6. Huang, Z.C., Wie, C.R., Johnstone, D.K., Stutz, C.E. and Evans, K.R., J. Appl. Phys., 73, 4362 (1993)Google Scholar
7. Terao, H. and H.Sunakawa, J. Cryst. Growth, 68, 157 (1984)Google Scholar
8. Keuch, T.F., Veuhoff, E., Kuan, T.S., Deline, V. and Potemski, R., J. Cryst. Growth, 77, 257 (1986)Google Scholar
9. Oh, E.G., Hanna, M.C., Lu, Z.H., Szmyd, D.M. and Majerfield, A., J. Appl. Phys., 74, 1057 (1993)Google Scholar
10. Kumagai, O., Kawai, H., Mori, Y. and Kaneko, K., Appl. Phys. Lett., 45, 1323 (1984)Google Scholar
11. Rai, A.K., Bhattacharya, R.S. and Pronko, P.P., Appl. Phys. Lett., 41, 1086 (1982)Google Scholar
12. Sandroff, C.J., Hegde, M.S., Farrow, L.A., Bhat, R., Harbison, J.P. and Chang, C.C., Appl. Phys. Lett., 67, 586 (1990)Google Scholar
13. Fan, J., Oigawa, H. and Nannichi, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 27, L2125 (1988)Google Scholar