Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T09:25:33.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of Materials from a Late 15th-Early 16th Century Polychromed Wood Sculpture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

L. P. Stodulski  and
V. J. Dorge
L. P. Stodulski
Affiliation:
THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS, 5200 WOODWARD AVE., DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48202
V. J. Dorge
Affiliation:
THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS, 5200 WOODWARD AVE., DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48202
Get access

Abstract

During conservation, The Detroit Institute of Arts' late Gothic carved wooden sculpture, Madonna and Child, was found to have extensive, though fragmentary, remains of the original polychromy and at least four subsequent “restoration” overpaints. The materials present in the original and overpaintings were probed by polarizing microscopic and X-ray diffraction analyses of individual paint specimens, and scanning electron microscopic/energydispersive X-ray analyses of cross sections prepared using an ultramicrotome. Several sections were also studied using ultraviolet fluorescence microscopic staining techniques to determine the nature of the media used.

The pigments identified include azurite, lead white, calcite, vermilion, red lead, hematite, red lakes and glazes, smalt and Prussian blue. Gold and silver metal leafs were also detected. The deteriorated remains of the late Gothic pressed brocade technique, and the use of “bronze” paint to approximate genuine gold leaf on a later addition to the sculpture, are also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 185: Symposium G – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology II , 1990 , 151
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

1 Mr. Barnet, Peter, Associate Curator of European Sculpture and Decorative Arts, The Detroit Institute of Arts (private communication).Google Scholar
2 Private communications with polychromed sculpture conservators in Stuttgart, Munich, Brussels and London during Dorge's research trip, April, 1989. Much of this information is based on the conservators' actual experience and observations but has not necessarily been published.Google Scholar
3 The area in question was X-radiographed but the results were inconclusive.Google Scholar
4 The authors realize that a materials analysis diamond knife would probably have produced smoother section surfaces, but one was not available to us at the time.Google Scholar
5 Schweppe, H. and Roosen-Runge, H. in Artists' Pigments, edited by Feller, R. L., (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1986), pp. 255–256.Google Scholar
6 Thompson, D. V., The Materials of Medieval Painting, 1st ed. (Allen and Unwin, Ltd., London, 1936), pp. 108–127.Google Scholar
7 Harley, R. D., Artists' Pigments c. 1600-1835, (American Elsivier Publishing Company, New York, 1970) pp. 120–136.Google Scholar
8. Ollermann, E., Farbige Skulpturen, edited by Taubert, J. (Verlag Georg D. W. Callwey, Munich, Germany, 1983), pp. 51–59.Google Scholar
9. Buczynski, B. and Krohm, H. in Zeitschrift Für Kunsttechnologie und Konservierung, Heft l, Jahrgang 3 (Wernersche Verlagsgellschaft, Worms-am-Rhein, Germany, 1989), pp. 173–175 and p. 188.; R. E. Straub, E. L. Richter, H. Harlin, and W. Barndt, Beiträge Untersuchunq und Konservierung Mittelalterächer Kunstwerke, H. Athäfer, R. E. Straub, E. Willemsen, Landesdenkmalamt Baden-Wurttemberg, Band 4, (Deutscher Kunstverlag, Munich, 1974) pp. 9-46.Google Scholar
10 Broekman-Bokstijn, M., Boer, J. R. J. Van Asperen De, Ehrnreich, E. H. Van't Hul- and Verduyn, C. M. - Groen, Studies in Conservation, 15 (4), 370–400 (1970).Google Scholar
11 Plenderleith, H. J. and Organ, R. M., Studies in Conservation, 1 (2) 63–72 (1953); F. Lihl, ibid., 7 (3), 89-105 (1962).Google Scholar
12 Harley, R.D., Artists' Pigments c. 1600-1835 (American Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, 1970), pp. 50–55 and pp. 65-68.Google Scholar
13 Fleming, S. J. in Authentication in the Visual Arts, edited by Jaffe', H. L. C., Leeuwen, J. S. van and Tweel, L. H. van der (B. M. Isräl BV, Amsterdam, 1979), pp. 104–109.Google Scholar
14 Welsh, F. S., Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 27 (2), 55–63 (1988).Google Scholar
15 Gettens, R. J. and Stout, G. L., Paintinq Materials (Dover Publications, New York, 1966), p. 98.; R. D. Harley, Artists Pigments c. 1600-1835 (Americarl Elsevier Publishing Company, New York, 1970), p. 108.Google Scholar
6 Thompson, D. V., The Materials of Medieval Paintiné, 1st. ed. (Allen and Unwin, Ltd., London, 1936).Google Scholar
17 Fitzhugh, E. W. in Artists' Pigments, edited by Feller, R. L. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1986), pp. 109–114.Google Scholar
18 Gettens, R. J., Köhn, H. and Chase, W. T., Studies in Conservation, 12 (4), 127 (1967).Google Scholar
19 Gettens, R. J., Feller, R. L. and Chase, W. T., Studies in Conservation, 17 (2), 45–69 (1972).Google Scholar
20 Muhlethaler, B. and Thissen, J., Studies in Conservation, 14 (2), 48–49 (1969).Google Scholar
21 Feller, R. L. in Artists' Pigments, edited by Feller, R. L. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1986), pp. 47–50.; H. Kuhn, ibid, pp. 169-172.Google Scholar
22 Barksdale, J., Turner, J. L. and Plechner, W. W. in Protective and Decorative Coatings, Vol II, edited by Mattiello, J. J. (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1942), p. 389.Google Scholar