Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-16T20:47:04.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

biomimetic Hydrogel/apatite Nanocomposite Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Esmaiel Jabbari*
Affiliation:
jabbari@engr.sc.edu, University of South Carolina, Chemical Engineering, 301 Main St, Columbia, South Carolina, 29208, United States, 803-777-8022, 803-777-8265
Get access

Abstract

Bone is a composite material consisting of aqueous gel and mineral phases. The aqueous gel phase gives bone its form and contributes to its ability to resist tension, while the mineral component resists compression. The combination of a hard inorganic phase and an elastic gel network provides bone with unique mechanical properties as well as a medium for diffusion and release of biologically active agents and it also facilitates communication with the cellular environment. A tissue engineered synthetic biomaterial as a scaffold for bone regeneration should provide temporary structural support to the reconstructed region and a medium for solubilization, diffusion, release of nutrients and growth factors, and their interactions with cells. In this work, the material and biologic properties of a novel synthetic matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) degradable hydrogel/apatite nanocomposite is investigated for its usefulness as a model matrix to mimic the gel and mineral components of the bone matrix and to fabricate aqueous-based scaffolds for bone regeneration. The gel phase is made from poly(lactide-ethylene oxide-fumarate), hereafter designated as PLEOF, terpolymer in which the water content can be adjusted by changing the ratio of the hydrophobic (lactide) to hydrophilic (ethylene oxide) oligomers. The hydrogel and apatite phases are crosslinked using an MMP degradable peptide crosslinker to modulate the matrix degradation kinetics with the migration of bone marrow stromal (BMS) cells. The results demonstrate that MMP degradable scaffolds fabricated from the PLEOF hydrogel and apatite nanoparticles are biocompatible and support cell attachment and migration.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Einhorn, T.A., Majeska, R.J., Mohaideen, A., Kagel, E.M., Bouxsein, M.L., Turek, T.J., and Wozney, J.M., J. Bone Joint Surg. 85A(8), 1425 (2003).Google Scholar
2. Yaszemski, M.J., Oldham, J.B., Lu, L., and Currier, B.L., “Clinical needs for bone tissue engineering technology,” Bone Engineering, ed. Davis, J.E. (em squared, 2000) pp.541547.Google Scholar
3. Glimcher, M.J., “The nature of the mineral component of bone and the mechanisms of calcification,” Disorders of bone and mineral metabolism, ed. Coe, F.L. and Favus, M.J. (Raven Press, 1992) pp.265286.Google Scholar
4. Bailey, A.J. and Knott, L., Exp. Gerontol. 34, 337 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Jabbari, E., Lu, L., and Yaszemski, M.J., “Synthesis and characterization of injectable and biodegradable composites for orthopedic applications,” Handbook of biodegradable polymeric materials and their applications, ed. Mallapragada, S.K. and Narasimhan, B. (American Scientific Publishers, 2004) Vol.2, Chap.11, pp.132.Google Scholar
6. Jabbari, E., “Synthesis and Characterization of poly(L-lactide) networks as injectable scaffolds for Guided Tissue Regeneration,” Proceedings AIChE, (Cincinnati, 2005) #50b.Google Scholar
7. Jabbari, E. E, “Encapsulation and mineralization of marrow stromal cells in synthetic biodegradable and in situ crosslinkable hydrogels,” Proceed. Int. Symp. Microencapsulation. (International Microencapsulation Society, 2003) pp.5455.Google Scholar
8. He, Z., Jabbari, E. E, “Solid-Phase Synthesis of Functionalized Peptides as Enzymatically Degradable Crosslinkers for Fabrication of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds,” Proceedings AIChE, (Cincinnati, 2005) #50c.Google Scholar
9. Jabbari, E., J. Microencapsul. 21(5), 525 (2004).Google Scholar
10. Borg, T.K., Rubin, K., Lundgren, E., Borg, K., and Obrink, B., Devel. Biol. 104, 86 (1984).Google Scholar
11. Jabbari, E. E, Florschutz, A.V., Petersen, L.G., Liu, N., Lu, L., Currier, B.L., and Yaszemski, M.J., “Release characteristics of recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 from PLGA microspheres embedded in a poly(propylene fumarate) porous scaffold,” Trans. Soc. Biomaterials, p. 512 (2004).Google Scholar