Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T02:24:30.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Creep Resistance of the Directionally Solidified Ceramic Eutectic of Al2O3/c-ZrO2(Y2O3)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jin Yi
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, U.S.A.
Ali S. Argon
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, U.S.A.
Ali Sayir
Affiliation:
NASA - John Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, 44135
Get access

Abstract

The creep resistance of the directionally solidified ceramic eutectic of Al2O3/c-ZrO2(Y2O3) was studied in the temperature range of 1200–1520°C both experimentally and by mechanistic dislocation models. The creep of the eutectic in its growth direction exhibits an initial transient that is attributed to stress relaxation in the c-ZrO2(Y2O3) phase, but otherwise in steady state shows many of the same characteristics of creep in sapphire single crystals with c-axis orientation. The creep strain rate of the eutectic has stress exponents in the range of 4.5–5.0 and a temperature dependence suggesting a rate mechanism governed by oxygen ion diffusion in the Al2O3. A detailed dislocation model of the creep rate indicates that much of the nano-scale encapsulated c-ZrO2(Y2O3) is too small to deform by creep so that the major contribution to the recorded creep strain is derived from the diffusion-controlled climb of pyramidal edge dislocations in the Al2O3 phase. The evidence suggests that the climbing dislocations in Al2O3 must repeatly circumvent the c-ZrO2(Y2O3) domains acting as dispersoids resulting in the stress exponents larger than 3. The creep model is in very good agreement with the experiments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

RefereNCE

1. Fleischer, R.L., J. Mater. Sci., 22, 22812288 (1987)Google Scholar
2. Firestone, R.F. and Heuer, A.H., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 59, 2429 (1976)Google Scholar
3. Dickey, E.C., In “Joint Metallic and Ceramic Materials Programs Review”, Air Force Office of Scientific Research (2002)Google Scholar
4. Dickey, E.C., Frazer, C.S., Watkins, T.R. and Hubbard, C.R., J. European Ceram. Soc., 19, 25032509 (1999)Google Scholar
5. Pastor, J.Y., Poza, P., Llorca, J., Pena, J.I., Merino, R.I. and Orera, V.M., Mater. Sci. & Engrg. A308, 241249 (2001)Google Scholar
6. Mazerolles, L., Michol, D. and Portier, R., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 69, 252255 (1986)Google Scholar
7. Sayir, A., unpublished report: NASA Glenn Research Center, private communication.Google Scholar
8. Sayir, A. and Farmer, S.C., Acta Mater., 48, 46914697 (2000)Google Scholar
9. Yi, J., Argon, A.S., and Sayir, A., J. European Ceram. Soc., submitted for publication.Google Scholar
10. Messerschmidt, U., Baufeld, B. and Baither, D., Key Engineering Materials, 153–154, 143182 (1998)Google Scholar
11. Argon, A.S., Yi, J. and Sayir, A., Mater. Sci. Engrg., A319–321, 838842 (2001)Google Scholar
12. Oishi, Y. and Kingery, W.D., J. Chem. Phys., 33, 480486 (1960)Google Scholar
13. Chiang, J., Bodur, C.T. and Argon, A.S., Phil. Mag. Letters, in the press.Google Scholar
14. Bodur, C.T., Chiang, J. and Argon, A.S., J. European Ceram. Soc., submitted for publication.Google Scholar
15. Nabarro, F.R.N., Phil. Mag., 16, 231238 (1967)Google Scholar
16. Li, J.C.M., In “Dislocation Dynamics”, edited by Rosenfield, A.R., Hahn, G.T., Bement, A.L. Jr and Jaffee, R.I., McGraw-Hill: New York pp.87116 (1968)Google Scholar
17. Friedel, J., in “Dislocations”, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 104 (1964)Google Scholar