Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T22:15:14.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dielectriic Dispersion Measurements of Salt-Water Saturated Porous Glass Compared with Local Porosity Theory.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

B. D. Hansen ,
E. Haslund ,
R. Hilfer  and
B. NØst
B. D. Hansen
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
E. Haslund
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
R. Hilfer
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway Institut fUr Physik, Universitäit Mainz, 6500 Mainz, Germany. Center for Advanced Study, Norwegian Academy of Science, P.O.Box 7606, 0205 Oslo, Norway
B. NØst
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
Get access

Abstract

A recent study [1] of the dielectric frequency response of a two component composite performed on a single specimen shows that local porosity theory LPT [2] represents a substantial improvement compared with other theories predicting the complex dielectric dispersion [3,4,5]. The purpose of the present work is to extend this investigation to a systematic study on several specimens with different compositions.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 290: Symposium N – Dynamics in Small Confining Systems , 1992 , 185
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Haslund, E., Hansen, B.D., Hilfer, R., and Nost, B., Measurement of Local Porosities and Dielectric Dispersion for a Water Saturated Porous Medium, UiO-preprint 1992.Google Scholar
2. Hilfer, R., Phys.Rev.B 44, 60 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Sen, P.N., Scala, C., and Cohen, M.H., Geophysics 46, 718 (1981).Google Scholar
4. Mendelson, K.S. and Cohen, M.H., Geophysics 47, 257 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Sen, P.N., Geophysics 49, 586 (1984).Google Scholar
6. James, G. and Bollinger, D.M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 57, 280 (1935).Google Scholar
7. Nest, B., Hansen, B.D., and Haslund, E., Physica Scripta T44, 67 (1992).Google Scholar
8. Holwech, I. and Nest, B., Phys.Rev. B39, 12845 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Boger, F., Feder, J., Jossang, T., and Hilfer, R., Physica A187, 55 (1992).Google Scholar
10. Bruggeman, D.A.G., Ann.Phys.(Leipzig) 24, 636 (1935).Google Scholar
11. James, F. and Roos, M., Comput.Phys.Commun. 10, 343 (1975).Google Scholar
12. Archie, G.E., Trans.Metall.Soc AIME 146, 54 (1942).Google Scholar