Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T03:22:04.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructural Refinement in Single-Phase Copper Solid Solutions by Machining

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

S. Swaminathan
Affiliation:
Schools of Engineering, Purdue University, 315 N. Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2023
S. Chandrasekar
Affiliation:
Schools of Engineering, Purdue University, 315 N. Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2023
W. D. Compton
Affiliation:
Schools of Engineering, Purdue University, 315 N. Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2023
K. P. Trumble
Affiliation:
Schools of Engineering, Purdue University, 315 N. Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2023
A. H. King
Affiliation:
Schools of Engineering, Purdue University, 315 N. Grant Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2023
Get access

Abstract

A study has been made of the effect of solute (Mn, Al, Ni) additions on microstructure refinement due to large strain deformation in single phase, copper solid solutions. The solutes were specifically selected for their influence on stacking fault energy (SFE) of copper, and the large strain deformation was imposed by chip formation in machining. The microstructure of Cu- 0.7at%Ni chip consists of elongated, sub-micrometer sized grains while Cu-7at%Al chip is made up of long, thin microbands with twins. The microstructure of the chip changes as the SFE of the material varies. With all of the solid solutions studied, the hardness of the chips is found to be significantly greater than that of the bulk material. Recrystallization temperature of solid solution chips is found to be higher than those of pure copper chips.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Segal, V. M., Reznikov, V. I., Drobyshevskiy, A. E. and Kopylov, V., Russ. Metall. 1, 99 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Valiev, R. Z., Islamgaliev, R. K., and Alexandrov, I. V., Prog. Mater. Sci. 45, 103 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Brown, T. L., Swaminathan, S., Chandrasekar, S., Compton, W. D., King, A. H. and Trumble, K. P., J. Mater. Res. 17, 2484 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Swaminathan, S., Brown, T. L., Shankar, M. Ravi, Rao, B. C., Trumble, K. P., Compton, W. D. and Chandrasekar, S. in Ultrafine Grained Materials III edited by Zhu, Y. T., Langdon, T. G., Valiev, R. Z., Semiatin, S. L., Shin, D. H. and Lowe, T. C., (TMS (The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 2004)) pp 161166.Google Scholar
5. Brown, T. L., Swaminathan, S., Rao, B. C., Kezar, R. F., Chandrasekar, S., Compton, W. D., Trumble, K. P. and King, A. H. in Ultrafine Grained Materials III edited by Zhu, Y. T., Langdon, T. G., Valiev, R. Z., Semiatin, S. L., Shin, D. H. and Lowe, T. C., (TMS (The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 2004)) pp 167172.Google Scholar
6. Steffens, T. and Schwink, C., Phil. Mag. A56, 161 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Harris, I. R., Dillamore, I. L., Smallman, R. E. and Beeston, B. E. P., Phil. Mag. 14, 325 (1966).Google Scholar
8. Swann, P. R. and Nutting, J., J. Inst. Met. 50, 133 (1961).Google Scholar
9. Lucci, A., Riontino, G., Tabasso, M. C., Tamanini, M. and Venturello, G., Acta. Metall. 26, 615 (1978).Google Scholar
10. Ramalingam, S., Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, (1967). Also see M. Ravi Shankar, M. S. Thesis, Purdue University, (2002).Google Scholar
11. Shaw, M. C., Metal Cutting Principles, (Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar