Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T11:41:54.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Doping Induced Internal Stress Reduction in Diamondlike Carbon Films Deposited by Pulsed Laser Ablation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Q. Wei ,
R. J. Narayan ,
A. K. Sharma ,
J. Sankar  and
J. Narayan
Q. Wei
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–7916
R. J. Narayan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–7916
A. K. Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–7916
J. Sankar
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411
J. Narayan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695–7916
Get access

Abstract

We have investigated the effect of dopants on the reduction of internal compressive stress in diamond-like carbon (DLC) films prepared by pulsed laser deposition on Si(100) substrates. A novel target configuration was used to incorporate dopants into DLC films by sequential pulsed laser ablation of two targets. These dopants include copper, titanium and silicon. The thickness of the DLC films deposited was measured in the range 400nm - 600nm using a profilometer. Raman spectroscopy was employed to analyze the chemistry of the films. The shifts of the G-peak position in the Raman spectrum, due to different concentrations of dopant, were used to estimate the internal stress changes. All of the films showed a Raman spectrum typical of DLC films containing a high fraction of sp3 species, with the G-peak centered at around 1510–1560cm−1. The shift of the G-peak due to the presence of dopants was observed for all the DLC films as compared to the undoped one. It was found that Ti has the strongest tendency to reduce the compressive stress of DLC films. This effect increases with increasing concentration of dopants. Silicon was also observed to have this effect, but the G-peak position did not appear to shift with different Si concentrations. Buckling occurred in the as-deposited, undoped DLC film because of the relief of the large compressive stress accumulated in the film, while all the doped DLC films showed good adhesion to the substrate. The results are discussed combining the atomic structure of DLC and the structure and properties of the dopants.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 498: Symposium AA – Covalently Bonded Disordered Thin-Film Materials , 1997 , 61
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Robertson, J., Prog. Solid State Chem., 21, 199(1991).Google Scholar
2. Bozhko, A., Ivanov, A., Berrettoni, M., Chudinov, S., Stizza, S., Dorfman, V. and Pypkin, B., Diamond and Related Mater., 4, 488(1995).Google Scholar
3. Milne, W. I., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 198–200, 605(1996).Google Scholar
4. Nir, D., Thin Solid films, 146, 27(1987).Google Scholar
5. Dumkum, C., Grant, D. M. and McColl, I. F., Diamond and Related Mater., 6, 802(1997).Google Scholar
6. Buckley, D. H. and Miyoshi, K., Wear, 100, 33(1984).Google Scholar
7. Antila, A., Salo, J. and Pappalainen, F., Mater. Lett., 24, 153(1995).Google Scholar
8. Wei, Q., Narayan, J., Narayan, R. J., Sankar, J. and Sharma, A. K., to be published in J. Mater. Sci. Eng.(B), 1998.Google Scholar
9. Pulsed Laser Deposition of Thin Films, edited by Chrisey, D. B. and Hubler, G. K., Wiley Interscience, 1994.Google Scholar
10. Street, R. A., Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991.Google Scholar
11. Wagner, J., Wild, C. and Koidl, P., Appl. phys. Lett., 59, 779(1991).Google Scholar
12. Yoshikawa, M., Fukuda, H., Nagai, N., Katagiri, G., Ishida, H., Ishitan, A. and Nagai, I., XII ICORS, edited by Durig, J. D. and Sullivan, J. F., 1990, p. 518.Google Scholar
13. Chen, X. and Narayan, J., J. Appl. Phys., 74, 4168(1993).Google Scholar
14. Chopra, K. L., Thin Film Phenomena, MiGraw-Hill Book Company, 1969, p. 314.Google Scholar
15. Johnston, C., Crossley, A., Jones, A. M., Chalker, P. R., Cullen, F. L. and Buckley, I. M., suppl. au J. de Phys. II, 1, pp. C2–931(1991).Google Scholar
16. Monteiro, O. R., Delplancke-Ogletree, M. P., Brown, I. G. and Ager, J. W. III, in Materials Modification and Synthesis by Ion Beam Processing, edited by Alexander, D. E., et al. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 438, Pittsburg, PA, 1997)p. 599.Google Scholar
17. Neto, A. L. B., Santos, R. A., Freire, F. L. Jr, Camargo, S. S. Jr, Carius, R., Finger, F. and Beyer, W., Thin Solid films, 293, 206(1997).Google Scholar