Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T08:08:02.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Shot Peening on Fatigue Properties of Zr-based Amorphous Matrix Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2011

Changwoo Jeon ,
Choongnyun Paul Kim  and
Sunghak Lee
Changwoo Jeon
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Aerospace Materials Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 790-784, Korea
Choongnyun Paul Kim
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Aerospace Materials Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 790-784, Korea
Sunghak Lee
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Aerospace Materials Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 790-784, Korea
Get access

Abstract

Effects of shot peening on fatigue properties of Zr-based amorphous matrix composite containing ductile crystalline particles were investigated, and fatigue processes were analyzed and compared with those of an as-cast composite. The microstructural analysis results of the shot-peened composite surface indicated that the deformation and surface flexion were observed as the shot-peening time or pressure increased. The compressive residual stress formed on the shot-peened surface was about the half of the ultimate tensile strength, and was not varied much with shot-peening time or pressure. The fatigue limit and fatigue ratio of the shot-peened composite were considerably higher than those of the as-cast composite. This was because the compressive residual stress formed by the shot peening induced the initiation of fatigue cracks at the specimen interior, instead of the specimen surface, thereby leading to the enhanced fatigue limit and fatigue life.

Keywords

fatiguefractureamorphous
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1300: Symposium U – Bulk Metallic Glasses and their Applications , 2011 , mrsf10-1300-u11-08
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gilbert, C.J., Schroeder, V., and Ritchie, R.O.: Metall. Mater. Trans. 30A, 1739 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Flores, K.M., Johnson, W.L., and Dauskardt, R.H.: Scripta Mater. 49, 1181 (2003).Google Scholar
3. Xing, L.Q., Li, Y., Ramesh, K.T., Li, J., and Hufnagel, T.C.: Phy. Rev. B 64, 180201(R) (2001).Google Scholar
4. Szuecs, F., Kim, C.P., and Johnson, W.L.: Acta Mater. 49, 1507 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Raghavan, R., Ayer, R., Jin, H.W., Marzinsky, C.N., and Ramamurty, U.: Scripta Mater. 59, 167 (2008)Google Scholar
6.I.C. Noyan and J.B. Cohen: “Residual Stress Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation”, (Materials Research and Engineering, Springer-Verlag New York Inc., 1987) pp. 117.Google Scholar
7. Liu, J., Yuan, H., and Liao, R.: Mater. Sci. Eng. A527, 5962 (2010).Google Scholar