Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T00:29:33.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Acid-Leached Fly Ash as a Pozzolan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

R. T. Hemmings
Affiliation:
Ortech International, Sheridan Park, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5K 1B3
E. E. Berry
Affiliation:
Matex Consultants Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L4Z 2G7
B. J. Cornelius
Affiliation:
Ortech International, Sheridan Park, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5K 1B3
D. M. Golden
Affiliation:
Electric Power Research Institute, Box 10412, Palo Alto, CA 94303
Get access

Abstract

Direct acid leaching (DAL) with HCl to recover Al and other metal values from fly ash has been examined extensively by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) under RP2422. Large scale utilization of the solid residues from the DAL-process (DAL-residues) could significantly influence the economics of resource recovery. This paper describes a study of the potential use of DAL-residue as a pozzolan in the concrete industry.

Samples of six ashes from a range of coal types were beneficiated to remove magnetic particles and particles larger than 45 gim. The beneficiated fractions were leached with 6M HCl at 105°C to determine metals recovery for Al, Fe, Ca, Mg, Na, K, and Ti. The corresponding DALresidues were characterized by chemical composition, morphology and mineralogical content, and examined as potential concrete pozzolans by standard ASTM tests. One DAL-residue from a highrank coal was examined more extensively in Portland cement mortars.

The greatest yields of Al were from low-rank coal ashes, but were obtained at the ‘cost’ of substantial salt-cake production and high acid consumption. The DAL-residues from all ash types showed high-Si content: those from high-rank coals being spherical pseudomorphs of the original ash particles, and those from low-rank coals containing substantial quantities of gel-like materials.

All of the residues were pozzolanic, but those from low-rank coals caused an unfavorable increase in water demand in mortars. DAL-residues from beneficiated high-rank coal ashes are enhanced pozzolans conforming to standard specification requirements with pozzolanic indices in excess of 100%.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. ASTM C 219-84, Standard Terminology Relating to Hydraulic Cement, Ann. Book of ASTM Standards, Section 4, Vol.4.01, 1987.Google Scholar
2. Davis, R.E., Carlson, R.W., Kelly, J.W. and Davis, H.E., ACI Journal 33, 577 (1937).Google Scholar
3. Dodson, V.H. and Roberts, L.R., “Portland Cement-Fly Ash-Aggregate Concretes,” U.S. Patent 4,210,457, July 1980.Google Scholar
4. Styron, R.W., in Proc. 2nd Int. Ash Util. Symp., Pittsburgh, PA., March 10–11, 1970, U.S. Bureau of Mines Information Circular IC 8488, pp. 151164.Google Scholar
5. Lister, R.A., in Proc. Ash Tec 84, CEGB, London, Sept. 1984.Google Scholar
6. Butler, W.B. and Mearing, M.A., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-products: Characterization. Utilization and Disposal II, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P., Roy, D.M. and Diamond, S., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc.,Vol. 65 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1985), pp. 1117.Google Scholar
7. Berry, E.E. and Hemmings, R.T., “Beneficiation of Fly Ash: An Overview of a Resource,” presented at 2nd Int. Conf. on the Use of Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, Madrid, Spain, April 1986.Google Scholar
8. Berry, E.E. and Hemmings, R.T., “Beneficiated Lingan Fly Ash - Properties and Applications,” presented at CANMET Seminar “Nova Scotia Fly Ashes,” Halifax, Nova Scotia, Nov. 28, 1986.Google Scholar
9. Malhotra, V.M., Ramachandran, V.S., Feldman, R.F. and Aitcin, P.C., Condensed Silica Fume in Concrete. (CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Fla., 1987).Google Scholar
10. Canon, R.M., Gilliam, T.M and Watson, J.S., Evaluation of Potential Processes for Recovery of Metals from Coal Ash, EPRI Report CS-1992, Volumes 1 and 2, (Electric Power Research Institute, 1981).Google Scholar
11. Wilder, R.F., Barrett, P.J., Henslee, L.W. and Arpi, D., Recovery of Metal Oxides from Fly Ash, EPRI Report CS-3544, 3 Volumes, (Electric Power Research Institute, 1981).Google Scholar
12. Golden, D.M. and Wilder, R.F., in Proc. 6th Int. Ash Util. Symp. and Exp., USDOE/METC-85/6018, Vol.2, May 1985, pp. 733752.Google Scholar
13. Wilder, R.F. and Markman, D.L., Recovery of Metal Oxides from Fly Ash, EPRI Report RP2442-8, (Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto May 1985).Google Scholar
14. Gabler, R.C. and Stoll, R.L., Resources and Conserv. 9, 131 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Gilliam, T.M, Canon, R.M., Egan, B.Z., Kelmers, A.D., Seeley, F.G. and Watson, J.S., Resources and Conserv. 9, 155 (1982).Google Scholar
16. Berry, E.E., Hemmings, R.T. and Golden, D.M., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion Byproducts: Characterization. Utilization and Disposal III, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P., Roy, D.M. and Diamond, S., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc., Vol.86 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1986), pp. 365380.Google Scholar
17. Berry, E.E., Hemmings, R.T. and Cornelius, B.J., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion Byproducts: Characterization. Utilization and Disposal IV, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P., Roy, D.M. and Hemmings, R.T., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc., Vol.113 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1987), pp. 5563.Google Scholar
18. Hemmings, R.T. and Berry, E.E., Evaluation of Plastic Filler Applications for Leached Fly Ash. EPRI Report CS-4765, (Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Sept. 1986).Google Scholar
19. Berry, E.E., Hemmings, R.T. and Golden, D.M. “Acid Leached Fly Ash as a Spherical Filler in Polymer Composites,” Proc. 42nd Ann. Conf. Soc. Plastics Ind., RP/CI Feb. 1987, paper 25-E.Google Scholar
20. Ashworth, R.A., Rodriguez, L.A., Padilla, A.A., Spake, N.B., Berry, W.W. and Schmeda, R.A., “Method for the Recovery of Minerals and Production of By-Products from Coal Ash,” U.S. Patent 4,652,433, March 1987.Google Scholar
21. Hemmings, R.T., Berry, E.E. and Cornelius, B.J., Evaluation of Pozzolanic Applications for Leached Fly Ash, EPRI Report CS-5982/RP2422-17 (Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Aug. 1988).Google Scholar
22. Hemmings, R.T. and Berry, E.E., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-products: Characterization. Utilization and Disposal IV, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P., Roy, D.M. and Hemmings, R.T., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc., Vol.113 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1987), pp. 338.Google Scholar
23. Hemmings, R.T. and Berry, E.E., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-products: Characterization. Utilization and Disposal II, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P. and Roy, D.M., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc., Vol.65 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1985), pp. 91104.Google Scholar
24. Hemmings, R.T., Berry, E.E., Cornelius, B.J. and Scheetz, B.E., in Fly Ash and Coal Conversion By-products: Characterization. Utilization and Disposal III, edited by McCarthy, G.J., Glasser, F.P., Roy, D.M. and Diamond, S., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc., Vol.86 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1986), pp. 8198.Google Scholar
25. The Feret index (FI) is a calculated strength ratio based on the original mix composition: where fi is the calculated strength, ci is the Portland cement volume, and wi is the water volume in the test (i-th) mix; and f0, c0, w0 are the corresponding values in the control (i.e., no pozzolan) mix at the same age. See reference 21 for more details.Google Scholar
26. ASTM C 311, Standard Test Method for Sampling and Testing Fly Ash or Natural Pozzolans for Use as a Mineral Admixture in Portland Cement Concrete, Ann. Book of ASTM Standards, Section 4, Vol 04.02, 1987.Google Scholar
27. ASTM C 618-85, Standard Specification for Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use as Mineral Admixture in Portland Cement Concrete, Ann. Book of ASTM Standards, Section 4, Vol.04.02, 1987.Google Scholar
28. Malhotra, V.M., Ramachandran, V.S., Feldman, R.F. and Aitcin, P-C., in Condensed Silica Fume in Concrete, (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. 1987).Google Scholar
29. Rilem Committee 73-SBC, Final Report. Siliceous By-Products for Use in Concrete, RILEM Tech. Report Materials and Structures, 21, pp. 69–79 (1988).Google Scholar
30. Carrette, G. (CANMET, Energy, Mines and Resources Canada), Personal Communication, 1988.Google Scholar
31. Berry, E.E. and Hemmings, R.T., to be submitted for publication in Cem. Conc. Res.Google Scholar