Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:19:43.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hydrostatic Pressure Studies of GaN/AlGaN/GaN Heterostructure Devices with Varying AlGaN Thickness and Composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Isaiah Steinke ,
M. Z. Kauser ,
P. Paul Ruden ,
Xianfeng Ni ,
Hadis Morkoc  and
Kyung-ah Son
Isaiah Steinke
Affiliation:
stei0194@tc.umn.edu, University of Minnesota, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 200 Union Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, United States
M. Z. Kauser
Affiliation:
mzkauser@ece.umn.edu, University of Minnesota, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, United States
P. Paul Ruden
Affiliation:
ruden@umn.edu, University of Minnesota, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, United States
Xianfeng Ni
Affiliation:
nix@vcu.edu, Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Richmond, VA, 23284, United States
Hadis Morkoc
Affiliation:
hmorkoc@vcu.edu, Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Richmond, VA, 23284, United States
Kyung-ah Son
Affiliation:
kson@jpl.nasa.gov, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, 91109, United States
Get access

Abstract

GaN-based heterostructure devices are of interest for pressure and stress sensing applications due to their potential for use at high temperatures and in caustic environments.We have grown n-GaN/u-AlGaN/n-GaN heterostructure devices on sapphire substrates by organometallic vapor phase epitaxy (OMVPE) using the epitaxial layer overgrowth (ELO) method.The devices were fabricated with varying AlGaN layer thickness and composition.Current-voltage (I-V) characteristics were obtained to characterize the performance of these devices under hydrostatic pressures up to 500 MPa.For a fixed bias, the current was observed to decrease in magnitude with increasing hydrostatic pressure for all devices tested.The current modulation is attributed to piezoelectric effects.Specifically, the polarization charge densities at both GaN/AlGaN interfaces are sensitive to changes in the hydrostatic pressure, and these charges affect the shape of the potential barrier and the current.Changes in the AlGaN layer thickness and composition modify the interfacial polarization, with thicker AlGaN layers and higher Al content increasing the effect of pressure on the observed I-V characteristics.The decreases in current magnitude with increasing pressure are linear over the pressure range tested.In order to quantify the performance of these devices, we calculate a pressure gauge factor based on a normalized change in current divided by the change in pressure.Values obtained range from 0.1–1.0 GPa−1, consistent with our previously published results for a single device.In addition, the turn-on voltages under both forward and reverse bias conditions are observed to increase with increasing AlGaN layer thickness and composition, a result that agrees with our device model.These turn-on voltages are governed by different mechanisms in the forward and reverse bias directions.Under forward bias, the mechanism is a transition from a thermionic to a tunneling process.However, under reverse bias, the turn-on occurs when the total electric field changes sign in the AlGaN layer.

Keywords

nitridepiezoelectricdevices
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 994: Symposium F – Semiconductor Defect Engineering–Materials, Synthetic Structures and Devices II , 2007 , 0994-F11-19
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Morkoç, H., Nitride Semiconductors and Devices, 2nd ed., (Springer-Verlag, New York, in press).Google Scholar
2. Wide Energy Bandgap Electronic Devices, edited by Ren, F. and Zolper, J. C. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2003).Google Scholar
3. Ambacher, O., J. Phys. D 31, 2653 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Liu, Y., Kauser, M. Z., Nathan, M. I., Ruden, P. P., Dabiran, A. M., Hertog, B., and Chow, P. P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 3398 (2002).Google Scholar
5. Liu, Y., Kauser, M. Z., Nathan, M. I., Ruden, P. P., Dogan, S., Morkoç, H., Park, S. S., and Lee, K.Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2112 (2004).Google Scholar
6. Liu, Y., Kauser, M. Z., Ruden, P. P., Hassan, Z., Lee, Y. C., Ng, S. S., and Yam, F. K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 022109 (2006).Google Scholar
7. Liu, Y., Ruden, P. P., Xie, J., Morkoç, H., and Son, K.-A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 013505 (2006).Google Scholar
8. Kang, B. S., Kim, S., Ren, F., Johnson, J. W., Therrien, R. J., Rajagopal, P., Roberts, J. C., Piner, E.L., Linthicum, K. J., Chu, S. N.G., Baik, K., Gila, B. P., Abernathy, C. R., and Pearton, S. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 2962 (2004).Google Scholar
9. Chu, S. N.G., Ren, F., Pearton, S. J., Kang, B. S., Kim, S., Gila, B. P., Abernathy, C. R., Chyi, J.-I., Johnson, W. J., and Lin, J., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 409, 340 (2005).Google Scholar
10. Liu, Y., Kauser, M.Z., Schroepfer, D.D., Ruden, P.P., Xie, J., Moon, Y.T., Onojima, N., Morkoc, H., Son, K.-A., and Nathan, M.I., J. Appl. Phys. 99, 113706 (2006).Google Scholar
11. Ambacher, O., Foutz, B., Smart, J., Shealy, J. R., Weimann, N. G., Chu, K., Murphy, M., Sierkowski, A.J., Schaff, W. J., Eastman, L. F., Dimitrov, R., Mitchell, A., and Stutzmann, M., J. Appl. Phys. 87, 334 (2000).Google Scholar
12. Ni, X., Xie, J., Fu, Y., Morkoç, H., Steinke, I. P., Liu, Y., Ruden, P. P., Son, K.-A., and Yang, B., Paper OA in proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, v 6473, Gallium Nitride Materials and Devices II, 2007, p xi–xii ISSN#0277-786X, ISBN# 9780819465863.Google Scholar
13. Hankey, R. E., Schuele, D. E., J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 48, 190 (1970).Google Scholar