Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-pt5lt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T18:27:54.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interfacial Debonding in PWBs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Junhui Li
Affiliation:
CALCE Electronic Packaging Research Center University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Michael Pecht
Affiliation:
CALCE Electronic Packaging Research Center University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Get access

Abstract

Glass fiber reinforced epoxy laminates have been widely applied in the electronic packaging industry as multilayer printed wiring boards (PWBs). Previous investigations indicate that, the electric insulation between printed through hole (PTH) and conductive lines can be lost if the boards are subjected to certain environmental conditions [1,2,3]. The insulation breakdown is caused by copper filament formation along the glass fibers once the filament bridges any two nearby circuittraces, such as a PTH and a power plane, or between two PTHs. The conductive filament formation is a two step process: path formation and electrochemical reaction. The path formation is caused by degradation of the glass-epoxy interface, which provides the copper ion migration path for the second step. Humidity and temperature are the key factors leading to interfacial degradation. Usually, humidity is of more concern because water absorption helps the path formation. Among board materials, epoxy resin, as the matrix material, is more susceptive to moisture absorption than glass fiber or copper [3,4]. Operating temperature that changes the degree of moisture absorption [5,6], and thermal cycling that enhances water absorption, and stress induced from thermal-mismatches [7], are also considered as the important factors to the interface degradation.

Epoxy/glass interfacial debonding can be introduced near PTHs by thermal cycling [8]. The interfacial debonding between glass fibers and the epoxy matrix near PTHs accelerates the electromigration process. In order to study the interfacial debonding mechanisms, thermal cycling tests of PWBs were conducted and the dynamic process of interfacial debonding was characterized using environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM). This paper presents the experimental results with discussion of the possible interfacial debonding mechanisms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. La, D. J., Mitchell, J. P. and Welsher, T. L., International Reliability Physics Symposium, p. 51, (1979).Google Scholar
2. Dumoulin, P., Seurin, J.P., and Marce, P., IEEE Trans. Comp., Hybrids, Manuf. Technol., vol. CHMT-5, p.476, (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Balu, R. S. and Pecht, M., Internal report of CALCE electronic packaging research center, (1993).Google Scholar
4. Krumbein, S. J., IEEE CHMT, p. 5, (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Lahti, J. N., Delaney, R. H. and Hines, J. N., International Reliability Physics Symposium, p. 39, (1987).Google Scholar
6. Illinger, J. L. and Schneider, N., Polymer Engineering and Science, vol.25, No.4, p.310, Mid- March, (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. El-Sa'ad, L., Darby, M. I. and Yates, B., Journal of Materials Science, vol.25, p. 3577, (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Li, J. and Pecht, M., The 6th Int. Sym. on Nondestructive Characterization of Materials, Proc., Oahu, Hawaii, June, (1993).Google Scholar
9. Lorenzo, F., and Laird, C., Mater. Sci. Eng., vol.62, pp.206210, (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Pecht, M., in Handbook of Electronic Package Design, (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1991).Google Scholar
11. Seraphim, D.P., Lasky, R., and Li, C.Y., in ”Principles of Electronic Packaging. (McGraw-Hill, Inc., U.S.A., 1989), pp. 365366.Google Scholar